This gives user visual feedback that the refresh is still pending, and
prevents people from clicking again and again thinking nothing is
happening. This is especially true for connections that fall back to
TURN, as that takes a few seconds to kick in.
Additionally, prevent clicking on the button again while a refresh
is pending. This is only delaying a successful result.
Also the memory allocation triggering the limit was never freed.
And if the exception was thrown in a constructor using placement new, the pre-allocated memory was not freed either.
hungarian: 4 changes by pnpBrumi
indonesian: 41 changes by bsuseno
italian: 28 changes by CoderLel
romanian: 46 changes by kneekoo
slovak: 18 changes by ApplePie420
danish: 279 changes by nielsmh
japanese: 18 changes by akaregi, 10 changes by clzls
slovenian: 17 changes by Matej1245
czech: 33 changes by CzechRepublic98
chinese (simplified): 27 changes by clzls
arabic (egypt): 17 changes by AviationGamerX
luxembourgish: 99 changes by phreeze83
hungarian: 24 changes by pnpBrumi, 6 changes by baliball
serbian: 107 changes by nkrs
romanian: 16 changes by kneekoo, 2 changes by ALEX11BR
irish: 229 changes by temuchie
ukrainian: 113 changes by StepanIvasyn
latvian: 8 changes by lexuslatvia
lithuanian: 41 changes by devbotas
polish: 1 change by yazalo
MCST e2k (Elbrus 2000) architecture has half native / half software support of most Intel/AMD SIMD
e.g. MMX/SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4.1/SSE4.2/AES/AVX/AVX2 & 3DNow!/SSE4a/XOP/FMA4
E2K - this is VLIW/EPIC architecture, like Intel Itanium (IA-64) architecture.
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbrus_2000
Co-authored-by: Alexander Troosh @troosh, Konstantin Ivlev @sse4 and Dmitry Shcherbakov @crypto-das
swedish: 8 changes by Abbin44
norwegian (bokmal): 14 changes by Anolitt
chinese (traditional): 6 changes by SiderealArt
slovenian: 4 changes by Matej1245
vietnamese: 14 changes by KhoiCanDev
luxembourgish: 24 changes by phreeze83
hungarian: 1 change by baliball
serbian: 29 changes by nkrs
german: 1 change by SecretIdetity
russian: 2 changes by SecretIdetity, 1 change by Ln-Wolf
catalan: 1 change by J0anJosep
turkish: 1 change by ahmetlii
french: 1 change by glx22
korean: 4 changes by telk5093
greek: 1 change by dionisis84
russian: 2 changes by Ln-Wolf
finnish: 1 change by hpiirai
portuguese: 1 change by azulcosta
english (us): 3 changes by 2TallTyler
greek: 3 changes by dionisis84
finnish: 3 changes by hpiirai
french: 3 changes by glx22
portuguese: 4 changes by azulcosta
It is not like we will drain the sea first, to put water back in it after.
Besides, the cost for draining the sea isn't calculated for all other cases either.
