Haven't gotten to all of them, but this:
- Updates some of the tools notebooks to actually instantiate a tool
(many just show a 'utility' rather than a tool. More changes to come in
separate PR)
- Move the `Tool` and decorator definitions to `langchain/tools/base.py`
(but still export from `langchain.agents`)
- Add scene explain to the load_tools() function
- Add unit tests for public apis for the langchain.tools and langchain.agents modules
Move tool validation to each implementation of the Agent.
Another alternative would be to adjust the `_validate_tools()` signature
to accept the output parser (and format instructions) and add logic
there. Something like
`parser.outputs_structured_actions(format_instructions)`
But don't think that's needed right now.
History from Motorhead memory return in reversed order
It should be Human: 1, AI:..., Human: 2, Ai...
```
You are a chatbot having a conversation with a human.
AI: I'm sorry, I'm still not sure what you're trying to communicate. Can you please provide more context or information?
Human: 3
AI: I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "1" and "2". Could you please clarify your request or question?
Human: 2
AI: Hello, how can I assist you today?
Human: 1
Human: 4
AI:
```
So, i `reversed` the messages before putting in chat_memory.
The llm type of AzureOpenAI was previously set to default, which is
openai. But since AzureOpenAI has different API from openai, it creates
problems when doing chain saving and loading. This PR corrected the llm
type of AzureOpenAI to "azure"
Re: https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/3777
Copy pasting from the issue:
While working on https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/3722 I
have noticed that there might be a bug in the current implementation of
the OpenAI length safe embeddings in `_get_len_safe_embeddings`, which
before https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/3722 was actually
the **default implementation** regardless of the length of the context
(via https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/pull/2330).
It appears the weights used are constant and the length of the embedding
vector (1536) and NOT the number of tokens in the batch, as in the
reference implementation at
https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook/blob/main/examples/Embedding_long_inputs.ipynb
<hr>
Here's some debug info:
<img width="1094" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1419010/235286595-a8b55298-7830-45df-b9f7-d2a2ad0356e0.png">
<hr>
We can also validate this against the reference implementation:
<details>
<summary>Reference implementation (click to unroll)</summary>
This implementation is copy pasted from
https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook/blob/main/examples/Embedding_long_inputs.ipynb
```py
import openai
from itertools import islice
import numpy as np
from tenacity import retry, wait_random_exponential, stop_after_attempt, retry_if_not_exception_type
EMBEDDING_MODEL = 'text-embedding-ada-002'
EMBEDDING_CTX_LENGTH = 8191
EMBEDDING_ENCODING = 'cl100k_base'
# let's make sure to not retry on an invalid request, because that is what we want to demonstrate
@retry(wait=wait_random_exponential(min=1, max=20), stop=stop_after_attempt(6), retry=retry_if_not_exception_type(openai.InvalidRequestError))
def get_embedding(text_or_tokens, model=EMBEDDING_MODEL):
return openai.Embedding.create(input=text_or_tokens, model=model)["data"][0]["embedding"]
def batched(iterable, n):
"""Batch data into tuples of length n. The last batch may be shorter."""
# batched('ABCDEFG', 3) --> ABC DEF G
if n < 1:
raise ValueError('n must be at least one')
it = iter(iterable)
while (batch := tuple(islice(it, n))):
yield batch
def chunked_tokens(text, encoding_name, chunk_length):
encoding = tiktoken.get_encoding(encoding_name)
tokens = encoding.encode(text)
chunks_iterator = batched(tokens, chunk_length)
yield from chunks_iterator
def reference_safe_get_embedding(text, model=EMBEDDING_MODEL, max_tokens=EMBEDDING_CTX_LENGTH, encoding_name=EMBEDDING_ENCODING, average=True):
chunk_embeddings = []
chunk_lens = []
for chunk in chunked_tokens(text, encoding_name=encoding_name, chunk_length=max_tokens):
chunk_embeddings.append(get_embedding(chunk, model=model))
chunk_lens.append(len(chunk))
if average:
chunk_embeddings = np.average(chunk_embeddings, axis=0, weights=chunk_lens)
chunk_embeddings = chunk_embeddings / np.linalg.norm(chunk_embeddings) # normalizes length to 1
chunk_embeddings = chunk_embeddings.tolist()
return chunk_embeddings
```
</details>
```py
long_text = 'foo bar' * 5000
reference_safe_get_embedding(long_text, average=True)[:10]
# Here's the first 10 floats from the reference embeddings:
[0.004407593824276758,
0.0017611146161865465,
-0.019824815970984996,
-0.02177626039794025,
-0.012060967454897886,
0.0017955296329155309,
-0.015609168983609643,
-0.012059823076681351,
-0.016990468527792825,
-0.004970484452089445]
# and now langchain implementation
from langchain.embeddings.openai import OpenAIEmbeddings
OpenAIEmbeddings().embed_query(long_text)[:10]
[0.003791506184693747,
0.0025310066579390025,
-0.019282322699514628,
-0.021492679249899803,
-0.012598522213242891,
0.0022181168611315662,
-0.015858940621301307,
-0.011754004130791204,
-0.016402944319627515,
-0.004125287485127554]
# clearly they are different ^
```
- Add langchain.llms.GooglePalm for text completion,
- Add langchain.chat_models.ChatGooglePalm for chat completion,
- Add langchain.embeddings.GooglePalmEmbeddings for sentence embeddings,
- Add example field to HumanMessage and AIMessage so that users can feed
in examples into the PaLM Chat API,
- Add system and unit tests.
Note async completion for the Text API is not yet supported and will be
included in a future PR.
Happy for feedback on any aspect of this PR, especially our choice of
adding an example field to Human and AI Message objects to enable
passing example messages to the API.
This pull request adds unit tests for various output parsers
(BooleanOutputParser, CommaSeparatedListOutputParser, and
StructuredOutputParser) to ensure their correct functionality and to
increase code reliability and maintainability. The tests cover both
valid and invalid input cases.
Changes:
Added unit tests for BooleanOutputParser.
Added unit tests for CommaSeparatedListOutputParser.
Added unit tests for StructuredOutputParser.
Testing:
All new unit tests have been executed, and they pass successfully.
The overall test suite has been run, and all tests pass.
Notes:
These tests cover both successful parsing scenarios and error handling
for invalid inputs.
If any new output parsers are added in the future, corresponding unit
tests should also be created to maintain coverage.
With longer context and completions, gpt-3.5-turbo and, especially,
gpt-4, will more times than not take > 60seconds to respond.
Based on some other discussions, it seems like this is an increasingly
common problem, especially with summarization tasks.
- https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/3512
- https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/3005
OpenAI's max 600s timeout seems excessive, so I settled on 120, but I do
run into generations that take >240 seconds when using large prompts and
completions with GPT-4, so maybe 240 would be a better compromise?
Enum to string conversion handled differently between python 3.9 and
3.11, currently breaking in 3.11 (see #3788). Thanks @peter-brady for
catching this!
This looks like a bug.
Overall by using len instead of token_counter the prompt thinks it has
less context window than it actually does. Because of this it adds fewer
messages. The reduced previous message context makes the agent
repetitive when selecting tasks.
Currently `langchain.agents.agent_toolkits.SQLDatabaseToolkit` has a
field `llm` with type `BaseLLM`. This breaks initialization for some
LLMs. For example, trying to use it with GPT4:
```
from langchain.sql_database import SQLDatabase
from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI
from langchain.agents.agent_toolkits import SQLDatabaseToolkit
db = SQLDatabase.from_uri("some_db_uri")
llm = ChatOpenAI(model_name="gpt-4")
toolkit = SQLDatabaseToolkit(db=db, llm=llm)
# pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for SQLDatabaseToolkit
# llm
# Can't instantiate abstract class BaseLLM with abstract methods _agenerate, _generate, _llm_type (type=type_error)
```
Seems like much of the rest of the codebase has switched from BaseLLM to
BaseLanguageModel. This PR makes the change for SQLDatabaseToolkit as
well
In the current solution, AgentType and AGENT_TO_CLASS are placed in two
separate files and both manually maintained. This might cause
inconsistency when we update either of them.
— latest —
based on the discussion with hwchase17, we don’t know how to further use
the newly introduced AgentTypeConfig type, so it doesn’t make sense yet
to add it. Instead, it’s better to move the dictionary to another file
to keep the loading.py file clear. The consistency is a good point.
Instead of asserting the consistency during linting, we added a unittest
for consistency check. I think it works as auto unittest is triggered
every time with clear failure notice. (well, force push is possible, but
we all know what we are doing, so let’s show trust. :>)
~~This PR includes~~
- ~~Introduced AgentTypeConfig as the source of truth of all AgentType
related meta data.~~
- ~~Each AgentTypeConfig is a annotated class type which can be used for
annotation in other places.~~
- ~~Each AgentTypeConfig can be easily extended when we have more meta
data needs.~~
- ~~Strong assertion to ensure AgentType and AGENT_TO_CLASS are always
consistent.~~
- ~~Made AGENT_TO_CLASS automatically generated.~~
~~Test Plan:~~
- ~~since this change is focusing on annotation, lint is the major test
focus.~~
- ~~lint, format and test passed on local.~~
I have added a reddit document loader which fetches the text from the
Posts of Subreddits or Reddit users, using the `praw` Python package. I
have also added an example notebook reddit.ipynb in order to guide users
to use this dataloader.
This code was made in format similar to twiiter document loader. I have
run code formating, linting and also checked the code myself for
different scenarios.
This is my first contribution to an open source project and I am really
excited about this. If you want to suggest some improvements in my code,
I will be happy to do it. :)
Co-authored-by: Taaha Bajwa <taaha.s.bajwa@gmail.com>
The character code mismatches occurred when character information was
not included in the response header (In my case, a Japanese web page).
I solved this issue by changing the encoding setting to
apparent_encoding.
