correct OpenVPN tcp-over-tcp and a few other lines

pull/34/head
Nick Sweeting 5 years ago committed by GitHub
parent 209c42dc17
commit 9c3d5dab5a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

@ -162,12 +162,11 @@ But you can write your own solutions for these problems using WireGuard under th
## List of Other VPN Solutions ## List of Other VPN Solutions
- [WireGuard](https://www.wireguard.com/) - [WireGuard](https://www.wireguard.com/)
- [IPSec (IKEv2)](https://github.com/jawj/IKEv2-setup)/strongSwan: lots of brittle config that's different for each OS, NAT busting setup is very manual and involves updating the central server and starting all the others in the correct order, not great at reconnecting after network downtime, had to be manually restarted often - [IPSec (IKEv2)](https://github.com/jawj/IKEv2-setup)/strongSwan: in my exprience, there was lots of brittle config that was different for each OS, the NAT busting setup is very manual and involves updating the central server and starting all the others in the correct order, it wasn't great at becoming stable again after network downtime, had to be manually restarted often. your mileage may vary.
with that if it's the only option - [OpenVPN](https://openvpn.net/vpn-server-resources/site-to-site-routing-explained-in-detail/): can work over UDP or be disguised as HTTPS traffic over TCP
- [OpenVPN](https://openvpn.net/vpn-server-resources/site-to-site-routing-explained-in-detail/): stealthy because it looks like HTTPS traffic, but it does TCP-over-TCP (👎) - StealthVPN: haven't tried it, should I?
- StealthVPN: haven't tried it - [DsVPN](https://github.com/jedisct1/dsvpn): I think it does TCP-over-TCP which usually doesn't end well...
- [DsVPN](https://github.com/jedisct1/dsvpn): does TCP-over-TCP which usually doesn't end well... - [SoftEther](https://www.softether.org/) ([SSTP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Socket_Tunneling_Protocol)): haven't tried it yet, should I? (also does TCP-over-TCP?)
- [SoftEther](https://www.softether.org/) ([SSTP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Socket_Tunneling_Protocol)): haven't tried it yet, should I? (also does TCP-over-TCP)
- L2TP: somewhat outdated - L2TP: somewhat outdated
- PPTP: ancient, inflexible, insecure, doesn't solve all the requirements - PPTP: ancient, inflexible, insecure, doesn't solve all the requirements
- SOCKS/SSH: good for proxying single-port traffic, not a full networking tunnel or VPN - SOCKS/SSH: good for proxying single-port traffic, not a full networking tunnel or VPN

Loading…
Cancel
Save