patterns/anti_patterns/deref.md
Jaxel Rojas fb57f21ec1
Fix syntax error on code snippet (#246)
* Fix syntax error on code snippet

* Added comma to struct definition on code snippet

* cargo fmt, remove ignore flag

Co-authored-by: Marco Ieni <11428655+MarcoIeni@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-03-10 13:40:13 +01:00

129 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown

# `Deref` polymorphism
## Description
Abuse the `Deref` trait to emulate inheritance between structs, and thus reuse
methods.
## Example
Sometimes we want to emulate the following common pattern from OO languages such
as Java:
```java
class Foo {
void m() { ... }
}
class Bar extends Foo {}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Bar b = new Bar();
b.m();
}
```
We can use the deref polymorphism anti-pattern to do so:
```rust
use std::ops::Deref;
struct Foo {}
impl Foo {
fn m(&self) {
//..
}
}
struct Bar {
f: Foo,
}
impl Deref for Bar {
type Target = Foo;
fn deref(&self) -> &Foo {
&self.f
}
}
fn main() {
let b = Bar { f: Foo {} };
b.m();
}
```
There is no struct inheritance in Rust. Instead we use composition and include
an instance of `Foo` in `Bar` (since the field is a value, it is stored inline,
so if there were fields, they would have the same layout in memory as the Java
version (probably, you should use `#[repr(C)]` if you want to be sure)).
In order to make the method call work we implement `Deref` for `Bar` with `Foo`
as the target (returning the embedded `Foo` field). That means that when we
dereference a `Bar` (for example, using `*`) then we will get a `Foo`. That is
pretty weird. Dereferencing usually gives a `T` from a reference to `T`, here we
have two unrelated types. However, since the dot operator does implicit
dereferencing, it means that the method call will search for methods on `Foo` as
well as `Bar`.
## Advantages
You save a little boilerplate, e.g.,
```rust,ignore
impl Bar {
fn m(&self) {
self.f.m()
}
}
```
## Disadvantages
Most importantly this is a surprising idiom - future programmers reading this in
code will not expect this to happen. That's because we are abusing the `Deref`
trait rather than using it as intended (and documented, etc.). It's also because
the mechanism here is completely implicit.
This pattern does not introduce subtyping between `Foo` and `Bar` like
inheritance in Java or C++ does. Furthermore, traits implemented by `Foo` are
not automatically implemented for `Bar`, so this pattern interacts badly with
bounds checking and thus generic programming.
Using this pattern gives subtly different semantics from most OO languages with
regards to `self`. Usually it remains a reference to the sub-class, with this
pattern it will be the 'class' where the method is defined.
Finally, this pattern only supports single inheritance, and has no notion of
interfaces, class-based privacy, or other inheritance-related features. So, it
gives an experience that will be subtly surprising to programmers used to Java
inheritance, etc.
## Discussion
There is no one good alternative. Depending on the exact circumstances it might
be better to re-implement using traits or to write out the facade methods to
dispatch to `Foo` manually. We do intend to add a mechanism for inheritance
similar to this to Rust, but it is likely to be some time before it reaches
stable Rust. See these [blog](http://aturon.github.io/blog/2015/09/18/reuse/)
[posts](http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2015/10/08/virtual-structs-part-4-extended-enums-and-thin-traits/)
and this [RFC issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/349) for more details.
The `Deref` trait is designed for the implementation of custom pointer types.
The intention is that it will take a pointer-to-`T` to a `T`, not convert
between different types. It is a shame that this isn't (probably cannot be)
enforced by the trait definition.
Rust tries to strike a careful balance between explicit and implicit mechanisms,
favouring explicit conversions between types. Automatic dereferencing in the dot
operator is a case where the ergonomics strongly favour an implicit mechanism,
but the intention is that this is limited to degrees of indirection, not
conversion between arbitrary types.
## See also
- [Collections are smart pointers idiom](../idioms/deref.md).
- Delegation crates for less boilerplate like [delegate](https://crates.io/crates/delegate)
or [ambassador](https://crates.io/crates/ambassador)
- [Documentation for `Deref` trait](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/trait.Deref.html).