mirror of
https://github.com/oxen-io/lokinet.git
synced 2024-11-02 03:40:12 +00:00
61 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
61 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
This is a backport of the current C++ standard library to C++03/11/14. Obviously not everything
|
|
can be backported, but quite a bit can.
|
|
|
|
Quick Start
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
There are a couple of small examples to give you an idea of usage. If you have make and g++
|
|
you can build things quickly enough:
|
|
- clone the repo to /some/place/cppbackport
|
|
- make a temp dir /wherever/you/wanna/build
|
|
- cd /wherever/you/wanna/build
|
|
- make -f /some/place/cppbackport/examples/Makefile
|
|
|
|
The examples are all setup to compile the cppbackport files as a static library (libcppbackport.a),
|
|
and then link it with one of the main example files (ex., gibberish.cpp).
|
|
|
|
Installation
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
I recommend copying the lib directory into your project, and calling the included Makefile
|
|
to create libcppbackport.a. Link that into your project, and add the appropriate include
|
|
flags (ex., -iquotecppbackport).
|
|
|
|
Usage
|
|
=====
|
|
|
|
Basically, #include "filesystem.h" or similar. Then use cpp namespace in place of std namespace.
|
|
The headers are all named after their official counterparts, with the addition of the .h
|
|
extension.
|
|
|
|
FAQ
|
|
===
|
|
**Who is this library suitable for?**
|
|
Anyone, really. There are a few use cases:
|
|
- The primary use case is to provide some newer features to people who are stuck with/choose to use an older compiler
|
|
- Another use would be to soften the requirements of your own project (i.e., so your users can use an older compiler)
|
|
- In some cases, this project may provide usable code before compilers support a standard. For example, C++17 at the moment isn't even standardized, *but* we basically know what's in it so we can start supporting it.
|
|
|
|
**What's the license?**
|
|
BSD 3-clause. Use it. Contribute if you like. Don't blame us for things.
|
|
|
|
**What compiler(s)/platforms are supported**
|
|
The development environment is Fedora 24 with GCC 6.1.1. I've used it with earlier versions
|
|
of GCC (4.7.4, I think), and a semi-recent version of Clang. I've not tested under Windows, yet.
|
|
|
|
**Will this use C++11/14/17 if available?**
|
|
Yes. Based on the value of the __cplusplus define, the files will simply #include the
|
|
system header (as appropriate).
|
|
|
|
**Why not header-only?**
|
|
I actually like the interface/implementation distinction. Header-only implementations (IMO)
|
|
get way too large and the files are difficult to navigate. Also, save the compiler some work.
|
|
Also, installing a lib isn't really that hard.
|
|
|
|
**Does it work on Windows?**
|
|
Sorry, POSIX mostly. Would love for some Windows devs to help.
|
|
|
|
**Why not use Boost?**
|
|
There's some overlap, but there are differences, too. And none of these things, *individually*
|
|
are that big.
|