25 KiB
System calls in the Linux kernel. Part 1.
Introduction
This post opens up a new chapter in linux-insides book and as you may understand from the title, this chapter will be devoted to the System call concept in the Linux kernel. The choice of topic for this chapter is not accidental. In the previous chapter we saw interrupts and interrupt handling. The concept of system calls is very similar to that of interrupts. This is because the most common way to implement system calls is as software interrupts. We will see many different aspects that are related to the system call concept. For example, we will learn what's happening when a system call occurs from userspace, we will see an implementation of a couple system call handlers in the Linux kernel, VDSO and vsyscall concepts and many many more.
Before we start to dive into the implementation of the system calls related stuff in the Linux kernel source code, it is good to know some theory about system calls. Let's do it in the following paragraph.
System call. What is it?
A system call is just a userspace request of a kernel service. Yes, the operating system kernel provides many services. When your program wants to write to or read from a file, starts to listen for connections on a socket, delete or create a directory, or even to finish its work, a program uses a system call. In another words, a system call is just a C function that is placed in the kernel space and a user program can ask the kernel to do something via this function.
The Linux kernel provides a set of these functions and each architecture provides its own set. For example: the x86_64 provides 322 system calls and the x86 provides 358 different system calls. Ok, a system call is just a function. Let's look on a simple Hello world
example that's written in the assembly programming language:
.data
msg:
.ascii "Hello, world!\n"
len = . - msg
.text
.global _start
_start:
movq $1, %rax
movq $1, %rdi
movq $msg, %rsi
movq $len, %rdx
syscall
movq $60, %rax
xorq %rdi, %rdi
syscall
We can compile the above with the following commands:
$ gcc -c test.S
$ ld -o test test.o
and run it as follows:
./test
Hello, world!
Ok, what do we see here? This simple code represents Hello world
assembly program for the Linux x86_64
architecture. We can see two sections here:
.data
.text
The first section - .data
stores initialized data of our program (Hello world
string and its length in our case). The second section - .text
contains the code of our program. We can split the code of our program into two parts: first part will be before the first syscall
instruction and the second part will be between first and second syscall
instructions. First of all what does the syscall
instruction do in our code and generally? As we can read in the 64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-vol-2b-manual:
SYSCALL invokes an OS system-call handler at privilege level 0. It does so by
loading RIP from the IA32_LSTAR MSR (after saving the address of the instruction
following SYSCALL into RCX). (The WRMSR instruction ensures that the
IA32_LSTAR MSR always contain a canonical address.)
...
...
...
SYSCALL loads the CS and SS selectors with values derived from bits 47:32 of the
IA32_STAR MSR. However, the CS and SS descriptor caches are not loaded from the
descriptors (in GDT or LDT) referenced by those selectors.
Instead, the descriptor caches are loaded with fixed values. It is the respon-
sibility of OS software to ensure that the descriptors (in GDT or LDT) referenced
by those selector values correspond to the fixed values loaded into the descriptor
caches; the SYSCALL instruction does not ensure this correspondence.
and we are initializing syscalls
by the writing of the entry_SYSCALL_64
that defined in the arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S assembler file and represents SYSCALL
instruction entry to the IA32_STAR
Model specific register:
wrmsrl(MSR_LSTAR, entry_SYSCALL_64);
in the arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c source code file.
So, the syscall
instruction invokes a handler of a given system call. But how does it know which handler to call? Actually it gets this information from the general purpose registers. As you can see in the system call table, each system call has an unique number. In our example, first system call is - write
that writes data to the given file. Let's look in the system call table and try to find write
system call. As we can see, the write system call has number - 1
. We pass the number of this system call through the rax
register in our example. The next general purpose registers: %rdi
, %rsi
and %rdx
take parameters of the write
syscall. In our case, they are file descriptor (1
is stdout in our case), second parameter is the pointer to our string, and the third is size of data. Yes, you heard right. Parameters for a system call. As I already wrote above, a system call is a just C
function in the kernel space. In our case first system call is write. This system call defined in the fs/read_write.c source code file and looks like:
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(write, unsigned int, fd, const char __user *, buf,
size_t, count)
{
...
...
...
}
Or in other words:
ssize_t write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t nbytes);
Don't worry about the SYSCALL_DEFINE3
macro for now, we'll come back to it.
The second part of our example is the same, but we call other system call. In this case we call exit system call. This system call gets only one parameter:
- Return value
and handles the way our program exits. We can pass the program name of our program to the strace util and we will see our system calls:
$ strace test
execve("./test", ["./test"], [/* 62 vars */]) = 0
write(1, "Hello, world!\n", 14Hello, world!
) = 14
_exit(0) = ?
+++ exited with 0 +++
In the first file of the strace
output, we can see execve system call that executes our program, and the second and third are system calls that we have used in our program: write
and exit
. Note that we pass the parameter through the general purpose registers in our example. The order of the registers is not not accidental. The order of the registers is defined by the following agreement - x86-64 calling conventions. This and other agreement for the x86_64
architecture explained in the special document - System V Application Binary Interface. PDF. In a general way, argument(s) of a function are placed either in registers or pushed on the stack. The right order is:
rdi
;rsi
;rdx
;rcx
;r8
;r9
.
for the first six parameters of a function. If a function has more than six arguments, other parameters will be placed on the stack.
We do not use system calls in our code directly, but anyway our program uses it when we want to print something, check access to a file or just write or read something to it.
For example:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
FILE *fp;
char buff[255];
fp = fopen("test.txt", "r");
fgets(buff, 255, fp);
printf("%s\n", buff);
fclose(fp);
return 0;
}
There are no fopen
, fgets
, printf
and fclose
system calls in the Linux kernel, but open
, read
write
and close
instead. I think you know that these four functions fopen
, fgets
, printf
and fclose
are just functions that defined in the C
standard library. Actually these functions are wrappers for the system calls. We do not call system calls directly in our code, but using wrapper functions from the standard library. The main reason of this is simple: a system call must be performed quickly, very quickly. As a system call must be quick, it must be small. The standard library takes responsibility to perform system calls with the correct set parameters and makes different check before it will call the given system call. Let's compile our program with the following command:
$ gcc test.c -o test
and look on it with the ltrace util:
$ ltrace ./test
__libc_start_main([ "./test" ] <unfinished ...>
fopen("test.txt", "r") = 0x602010
fgets("Hello World!\n", 255, 0x602010) = 0x7ffd2745e700
puts("Hello World!\n"Hello World!
) = 14
fclose(0x602010) = 0
+++ exited (status 0) +++
The ltrace
util displays a set of userspace calls of a program. The fopen
function opens the given text file, the fgets
reads file content to the buf
buffer, the puts
function prints it to the stdout
and the fclose
function closes file by the given file descriptor. And as I already wrote, all of these functions call an appropriate system call. For example puts
calls the write
system call inside, we can see it if we will add -S
option to the ltrace
program:
write@SYS(1, "Hello World!\n\n", 14) = 14
Yes, system calls are ubiquitous. Each program needs to open/write/read file, network connection, allocation of memory and many other things that can be provide only by the kernel. The proc file system contains special file in a format: /proc/pid/systemcall
that exposes the system call number and argument registers for the system call currently being executed by the process. For example, first pid that is systemd for me uses:
$ sudo cat /proc/1/comm
systemd
$ sudo cat /proc/1/syscall
232 0x4 0x7ffdf82e11b0 0x1f 0xffffffff 0x100 0x7ffdf82e11bf 0x7ffdf82e11a0 0x7f9114681193
the system call with number - 232
which is epoll_wait system call that waits for an I/O event on an epoll file descriptor. Or for example emacs
editor where I'm writing this part:
$ ps ax | grep emacs
2093 ? Sl 2:40 emacs
$ sudo cat /proc/2093/comm
emacs
$ sudo cat /proc/2093/syscall
270 0xf 0x7fff068a5a90 0x7fff068a5b10 0x0 0x7fff068a59c0 0x7fff068a59d0 0x7fff068a59b0 0x7f777dd8813c
the system call with the number 270
which is sys_pselect6 system call that allows emacs
to monitor multiple file descriptors.
Now we know a little about system call, what is it and why do we need in it. So let's look on the write
system that our program used.
Implementation of write system call
Let's look on the implementation of this system call directly in the source code of the Linux kernel. As we already know, the write
system call defined in the fs/read_write.c source code file and looks like this:
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(write, unsigned int, fd, const char __user *, buf,
size_t, count)
{
struct fd f = fdget_pos(fd);
ssize_t ret = -EBADF;
if (f.file) {
loff_t pos = file_pos_read(f.file);
ret = vfs_write(f.file, buf, count, &pos);
if (ret >= 0)
file_pos_write(f.file, pos);
fdput_pos(f);
}
return ret;
}
First of all about the SYSCALL_DEFINE3
macro. This macro defined in the include/linux/syscalls.h header file and expands to the definition of the sys_name(...)
function. Let's look on this macro:
#define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
#define SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, ...) \
SYSCALL_METADATA(sname, x, __VA_ARGS__) \
__SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
As we can see the SYSCALL_DEFINE3
macro takes name
parameter which will represent name of a system call and variadic number of parameters. This macro just expands to the SYSCALL_DEFINEx
macro that takes the number of the parameters the given system call, the _##name
stub for the future name of the system call (more about tokens concatenation with the ##
you can read in the documentation of gcc). Next we can see the SYSCALL_DEFINEx
macro. This macro expands to the two following macros:
SYSCALL_METADATA
;__SYSCALL_DEFINEx
.
Implementation of the first macro SYSCALL_METADATA
depends on the CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS
kernel configuration option. As we can understand from the name of this option, it allows to enable tracer to catch the syscall entry and exit events. If this kernel configration option is enabled, the SYSCALL_METADATA
macro executes initialization of the syscall_metadata
structure that defined in the include/trace/syscall.h header file and contains different useful fields as name of a system call, number of a system call in the system call table, number of parameters of a system call, list of parameter types and etc:
#define SYSCALL_METADATA(sname, nb, ...) \
... \
... \
... \
struct syscall_metadata __used \
__syscall_meta_##sname = { \
.name = "sys"#sname, \
.syscall_nr = -1, \
.nb_args = nb, \
.types = nb ? types_##sname : NULL, \
.args = nb ? args_##sname : NULL, \
.enter_event = &event_enter_##sname, \
.exit_event = &event_exit_##sname, \
.enter_fields = LIST_HEAD_INIT(__syscall_meta_##sname.enter_fields), \
}; \
static struct syscall_metadata __used \
__attribute__((section("__syscalls_metadata"))) \
*__p_syscall_meta_##sname = &__syscall_meta_##sname;
If the CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS
kernel option does not enabled during kernel configuration, in this way the SYSCALL_METADATA
macro expands to empty string:
#define SYSCALL_METADATA(sname, nb, ...)
The second macro __SYSCALL_DEFINEx
expands to the definition of the five following functions:
#define __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, name, ...) \
asmlinkage long sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__)) \
__attribute__((alias(__stringify(SyS##name)))); \
\
static inline long SYSC##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__)); \
\
asmlinkage long SyS##name(__MAP(x,__SC_LONG,__VA_ARGS__)); \
\
asmlinkage long SyS##name(__MAP(x,__SC_LONG,__VA_ARGS__)) \
{ \
long ret = SYSC##name(__MAP(x,__SC_CAST,__VA_ARGS__)); \
__MAP(x,__SC_TEST,__VA_ARGS__); \
__PROTECT(x, ret,__MAP(x,__SC_ARGS,__VA_ARGS__)); \
return ret; \
} \
\
static inline long SYSC##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__))
The first sys##name
is definition of the syscall handler function with the given name - sys_system_call_name
. The __SC_DECL
macro takes the __VA_ARGS__
and combines call input parameter system type and the parameter name, because the macro definition is unable to determine the parameter types. And the __MAP
macro applyes __SC_DECL
macro to the __VA_ARGS__
arguments. The other functions that are generated by the __SYSCALL_DEFINEx
macro are need to protect from the CVE-2009-0029 and we will not dive into details about this here. Ok, as result of the SYSCALL_DEFINE3
macro, we will have:
asmlinkage long sys_write(unsigned int fd, const char __user * filename, size_t count);
Now we know a little about system calls definition and we can back to the implementation of the write
system call. Let's look on the implementation of this system call again:
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(write, unsigned int, fd, const char __user *, buf,
size_t, count)
{
struct fd f = fdget_pos(fd);
ssize_t ret = -EBADF;
if (f.file) {
loff_t pos = file_pos_read(f.file);
ret = vfs_write(f.file, buf, count, &pos);
if (ret >= 0)
file_pos_write(f.file, pos);
fdput_pos(f);
}
return ret;
}
As we already know and can see on the code, it takes three arguments:
fd
- file descriptor;buf
- buffer to write;count
- length of buffer to write.
and writes data from a buffer declared by the user to a given device or a file. Note that the second parameter buf
, defined with the __user
attribute. The main purpose of this attribute is for checking of the Linux kernel code with the sparse util. It defined in the include/linux/compiler.h header file and depends on the __CHECKER__
definition in the Linux kernel. That's all about useful meta-information related to our sys_write
system call, let's try to understand how this system call is implemented. As we can see it starts from the definition of the f
structure that has fd
structure type that represent file descriptor in the Linux kernel and we put the result of the call of the fdget_pos
function. The fdget_pos
function defined in the same source code file and just expands to the call of the __to_fd
function:
static inline struct fd fdget_pos(int fd)
{
return __to_fd(__fdget_pos(fd));
}
The main purpose of the fdget_pos
is convert given file descriptor which is just number to the fd
strucutre. Through the long chain of function calls, the fdget_pos
function get the file descriptor table of the current process or in another words current->files
and tries to find correspnding file descriptor number there. As we got fd
structure for the given file descriptor number, we check it and return if it does not exist. In other way we get the current position in the file with the call of the file_pos_read
function that just returns f_pos
field of the our file:
static inline loff_t file_pos_read(struct file *file)
{
return file->f_pos;
}
and call the vfs_write
function. The vfs_write
function defined the fs/read_write.c source code file and does main work for us - writes given buffer to the given file starting from the given position. We will not dive into details about the vfs_write
function, because this function is weakly related to the system call
concept but mostly about Virtual file system concept which we will see in another chapter. As the vfs_write
has finished its work, we check the result of it and if it was finished successfully we change the position in the file with the file_pos_write
function:
if (ret >= 0)
file_pos_write(f.file, pos);
that just updates f_pos
with the given position of the give file:
static inline void file_pos_write(struct file *file, loff_t pos)
{
file->f_pos = pos;
}
In the end of the our write
system call handler, we can see call of the following function:
fdput_pos(f);
unlocks the f_pos_lock
mutex that protects file position during concurrently write from threads that share file descriptor.
That's all.
Just now, we partly saw implementation one of system calls that provided by the Linux kernel. Of course we have missed some parts in the implementation of the write
system call in this part, because as I already wrote above, we will see only system calls related stuff in this chapter and will not see other stuff related to the other subsystem as Virtual file system and etc.
Conclusion
This is the end of the first part about system calls concept in the Linux kernel. We saw theory about this concept in this part and in the next part we will continue to dive into this topic and start to touch Linux kernel code which is related to the system calls.
If you have questions or suggestions, feel free to ping me in twitter 0xAX, drop me email or just create issue.
Please note that English is not my first language and I am really sorry for any inconvenience. If you found any mistakes please send me PR to linux-insides.
Links
- system call
- vdso
- vsyscall
- general purpose registers
- socket
- C programming language
- x86
- x86_64
- x86-64 calling conventions
- System V Application Binary Interface. PDF
- GCC
- Intel manual. PDF
- system call table
- GCC macro documentation
- file descriptor
- stdout
- strace
- standard library
- wrapper functions
- ltrace
- sparse
- proc file system
- Virtual file system
- systemd
- epoll
- Previous chapter