mirror of
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain
synced 2024-11-10 01:10:59 +00:00
2ad29f410d
# fix a mistake in concepts.md ## Who can review? Community members can review the PR once tests pass. Tag maintainers/contributors who might be interested:
76 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
76 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# Concepts
|
||
|
||
These are concepts and terminology commonly used when developing LLM applications.
|
||
It contains reference to external papers or sources where the concept was first introduced,
|
||
as well as to places in LangChain where the concept is used.
|
||
|
||
## Chain of Thought
|
||
|
||
`Chain of Thought (CoT)` is a prompting technique used to encourage the model to generate a series of intermediate reasoning steps.
|
||
A less formal way to induce this behavior is to include “Let’s think step-by-step” in the prompt.
|
||
|
||
- [Chain-of-Thought Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.11903.pdf)
|
||
- [Step-by-Step Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00114)
|
||
|
||
## Action Plan Generation
|
||
|
||
`Action Plan Generation` is a prompting technique that uses a language model to generate actions to take.
|
||
The results of these actions can then be fed back into the language model to generate a subsequent action.
|
||
|
||
- [WebGPT Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.09332.pdf)
|
||
- [SayCan Paper](https://say-can.github.io/assets/palm_saycan.pdf)
|
||
|
||
## ReAct
|
||
|
||
`ReAct` is a prompting technique that combines Chain-of-Thought prompting with action plan generation.
|
||
This induces the model to think about what action to take, then take it.
|
||
|
||
- [Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.03629.pdf)
|
||
- [LangChain Example](../modules/agents/agents/examples/react.ipynb)
|
||
|
||
## Self-ask
|
||
|
||
`Self-ask` is a prompting method that builds on top of chain-of-thought prompting.
|
||
In this method, the model explicitly asks itself follow-up questions, which are then answered by an external search engine.
|
||
|
||
- [Paper](https://ofir.io/self-ask.pdf)
|
||
- [LangChain Example](../modules/agents/agents/examples/self_ask_with_search.ipynb)
|
||
|
||
## Prompt Chaining
|
||
|
||
`Prompt Chaining` is combining multiple LLM calls, with the output of one-step being the input to the next.
|
||
|
||
- [PromptChainer Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.06566.pdf)
|
||
- [Language Model Cascades](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10342)
|
||
- [ICE Primer Book](https://primer.ought.org/)
|
||
- [Socratic Models](https://socraticmodels.github.io/)
|
||
|
||
## Memetic Proxy
|
||
|
||
`Memetic Proxy` is encouraging the LLM
|
||
to respond in a certain way framing the discussion in a context that the model knows of and that
|
||
will result in that type of response.
|
||
For example, as a conversation between a student and a teacher.
|
||
|
||
- [Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.07350.pdf)
|
||
|
||
## Self Consistency
|
||
|
||
`Self Consistency` is a decoding strategy that samples a diverse set of reasoning paths and then selects the most consistent answer.
|
||
Is most effective when combined with Chain-of-thought prompting.
|
||
|
||
- [Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.11171.pdf)
|
||
|
||
## Inception
|
||
|
||
`Inception` is also called `First Person Instruction`.
|
||
It is encouraging the model to think a certain way by including the start of the model’s response in the prompt.
|
||
|
||
- [Example](https://twitter.com/goodside/status/1583262455207460865?s=20&t=8Hz7XBnK1OF8siQrxxCIGQ)
|
||
|
||
## MemPrompt
|
||
|
||
`MemPrompt` maintains a memory of errors and user feedback, and uses them to prevent repetition of mistakes.
|
||
|
||
- [Paper](https://memprompt.com/)
|