LLMs struggle with Graph RAG, because it's different from vector RAG in
a way that you don't provide the whole context, only the answer and the
LLM has to believe. However, that doesn't really work a lot of the time.
However, if you wrap the context as function response the accuracy is
much better.
btw... `union[LLMChain, Runnable]` is linting fun, that's why so many
ignores
0.2rc
migrations
- [x] Move memory
- [x] Move remaining retrievers
- [x] graph_qa chains
- [x] some dependency from evaluation code potentially on math utils
- [x] Move openapi chain from `langchain.chains.api.openapi` to
`langchain_community.chains.openapi`
- [x] Migrate `langchain.chains.ernie_functions` to
`langchain_community.chains.ernie_functions`
- [x] migrate `langchain/chains/llm_requests.py` to
`langchain_community.chains.llm_requests`
- [x] Moving `langchain_community.cross_enoders.base:BaseCrossEncoder`
->
`langchain_community.retrievers.document_compressors.cross_encoder:BaseCrossEncoder`
(namespace not ideal, but it needs to be moved to `langchain` to avoid
circular deps)
- [x] unit tests langchain -- add pytest.mark.community to some unit
tests that will stay in langchain
- [x] unit tests community -- move unit tests that depend on community
to community
- [x] mv integration tests that depend on community to community
- [x] mypy checks
Other todo
- [x] Make deprecation warnings not noisy (need to use warn deprecated
and check that things are implemented properly)
- [x] Update deprecation messages with timeline for code removal (likely
we actually won't be removing things until 0.4 release) -- will give
people more time to transition their code.
- [ ] Add information to deprecation warning to show users how to
migrate their code base using langchain-cli
- [ ] Remove any unnecessary requirements in langchain (e.g., is
SQLALchemy required?)
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
