The test as it exists relies on the robolectric lifecycle, which is hard
to predict, so it doesn't seem worth fixing the test. Writing the test
any other way would require excessive mocking, which also seems
impractical.
We've noticed that geckoview_example is ~300ms faster than fenix in cold page
load tests on arewefastyet for the Pixel 2. We suspect the main
difference is because geckoview_example runs with conditioned profiles
and fenix does not.
This PR is foremost an experiment to see if that's true because, after bug
1587542, we cannot run get results for fenix perftest PRs (i.e. it needs to be
merged into main). If we find that the results are not noisy, however, we
could end up leaving this in the tree. We've previously seen excessive
noise with fenix start up tests with conditioned profiles which is why
conditioned profiles are not currently enabled.
The Glean core native code is now shipped through GeckoView directly
(through its `-omni` packages).
For local tests we need a library matching the host-platform, which is
available in the glean-native package.
* [WIP] New Layout for adding login and 'add login' button in 'SavedLoginsListView' to launch it.
Fixed bindings.
* [WIP] Removed "reveal password" button
* [WIP] Added interactor for the add login screen
* [WIP] Trying to check for duplicates
* [WIP] Renaming "addNew..." with "add..."
* [WIP] Check for duplicates
* [WIP] Fixes after merge
* Cleaning up the layout and making edit text for hostname selectable
* Error handling on add login screen. Tests for interactors and controllers
Co-authored-by: Vitaly V. Pinchuk <vetal.978@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This doesn't seem to be a high value test: increasing the view hierarchy
depth will only result in a performance problem on low end devices
if there is enough content on the new layer to cause the traversal to
take longer. It's more likely to result in a hard-to-workaround false
positive so we can remove it, like component init count.
