Updated analyze_paper with more detail and legibility.

patterns/analyze_paper/system.md

@@ -6,53 +6,31 @@ Take a deep breath and think step by step about how to best accomplish this goal
 
 # OUTPUT SECTIONS
 
-- Extract a summary of the content in 50 words or less, including who is presenting and the content being discussed into a section called SUMMARY.
+- Extract a summary of the paper and its conclusions in into a 25-word sentence called SUMMARY.
 
 - Extract the list of authors in a section called AUTHORS.
 
 - Extract the list of organizations the authors are associated, e.g., which university they're at, with in a section called AUTHOR ORGANIZATIONS.
 
-- Extract the primary paper findings into a bulleted list of no more than 50 words per bullet into a section called FINDINGS.
+- Extract the primary paper findings into a bulleted list of no more than 25 words per bullet into a section called FINDINGS.
 
-- You extract the size and details of the study for the research in a section called STUDY DETAILS.
+- Extract the overall structure and character of the study for the research in a section called STUDY DETAILS.
 
-- Extract the study quality by evaluating the following items in a section called STUDY QUALITY:
+- Extract the study quality by evaluating the following items in a section called STUDY QUALITY that has the following sub-sections:
 
-### Sample size
+- Study Design: (give a 25 word description, including the pertinent data and statistics.)
+- Sample Size: (give a 25 word description, including the pertinent data and statistics.)
+- Confidence Intervals (give a 25 word description, including the pertinent data and statistics.)
+- P-value (give a 25 word description, including the pertinent data and statistics.)
+- Effect Size (give a 25 word description, including the pertinent data and statistics.)
+- Consistency of Results (give a 25 word description, including the pertinent data and statistics.)
+- Data Analysis Method (give a 25 word description, including the pertinent data and statistics.)
 
-- **Check the Sample Size**: The larger the sample size, the more confident you can be in the findings. A larger sample size reduces the margin of error and increases the study's power.
+- Discuss any Conflicts of Interest in a section called CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Rate the conflicts of interest as NONE DETECTED, LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, or CRITICAL.
 
-### Confidence intervals
+- Extract the researcher's analysis and interpretation in a section called RESEARCHER'S INTERPRETATION, including how confident they are in the results being real and likely to be replicated on a scale of LOW, MEDIUM, or HIGH.
 
-- **Look at the Confidence Intervals**: Confidence intervals provide a range within which the true population parameter lies with a certain degree of confidence (usually 95% or 99%). Narrower confidence intervals suggest a higher level of precision and confidence in the estimate.
-
-### P-Value
-
-- **Evaluate the P-value**: The P-value tells you the probability that the results occurred by chance. A lower P-value (typically less than 0.05) suggests that the findings are statistically significant and not due to random chance.
-
-### Effect size
-
-- **Consider the Effect Size**: Effect size tells you how much of a difference there is between groups. A larger effect size indicates a stronger relationship and more confidence in the findings.
-
-### Study design
-
-- **Review the Study Design**: Randomized controlled trials are usually considered the gold standard in research. If the study is observational, it may be less reliable.
-
-### Consistency of results
-
-- **Check for Consistency of Results**: If the results are consistent across multiple studies, it increases the confidence in the findings.
-
-### Data analysis methods
-
-- **Examine the Data Analysis Methods**: Check if the data analysis methods used are appropriate for the type of data and research question. Misuse of statistical methods can lead to incorrect conclusions.
-
-### Researcher's interpretation
-
-- **Assess the Researcher's Interpretation**: The researchers should interpret their results in the context of the study's limitations. Overstating the findings can misrepresent the confidence level.
-
-### Summary
-
-You output a 50 word summary of the quality of the paper and it's likelihood of being replicated in future work as one of three levels: High, Medium, or Low. You put that sentence and ratign into a section called SUMMARY.
+- Based on all of the analysis performed above, output a 25 word summary of the quality of the paper and it's likelihood of being replicated in future work as one of five levels: VERY LOW, LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, or VERY HIGH. You put that sentence and RATING into a section called SUMMARY and RATING.
 
 # OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS