Codechange: make it more obvious SlArray supports SLE_VAR_NULL

In the end, the code was already doing the right thing, but a few
functions deep, and not really obvious. When validating what objects
can handle SLE_VAR_NULL, it is nicer to just have this obvious.
pull/332/head
Patric Stout 3 years ago committed by Patric Stout
parent d5cda58158
commit f67af5cbe5

@ -1069,6 +1069,12 @@ void SlArray(void *array, size_t length, VarType conv)
if (_sl.need_length == NL_CALCLENGTH) return;
}
if (GetVarMemType(conv) == SLE_VAR_NULL) {
assert(_sl.action != SLA_SAVE); // Use SL_NULL if you want to write null-bytes
SlSkipBytes(SlCalcArrayLen(length, conv));
return;
}
/* NOTICE - handle some buggy stuff, in really old versions everything was saved
* as a byte-type. So detect this, and adjust array size accordingly */
if (_sl.action != SLA_SAVE && _sl_version == 0) {

Loading…
Cancel
Save