Follow-up of @hinthornw's PR:
- Migrate the Tool abstraction to a separate file (`BaseTool`).
- `Tool` implementation of `BaseTool` takes in function and coroutine to
more easily maintain backwards compatibility
- Add a Toolkit abstraction that can own the generation of tools around
a shared concept or state
---------
Co-authored-by: William FH <13333726+hinthornw@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Ingham <fpingham@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Anand <105786647+dhruv-anand-aintech@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cragwolfe <cragcw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anton Troynikov <atroyn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Klingefjord <oliver@klingefjord.com>
Co-authored-by: William Fu-Hinthorn <whinthorn@Williams-MBP-3.attlocal.net>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Bornsztein <bruno.bornsztein@gmail.com>
This is a work in progress PR to track my progres.
## TODO:
- [x] Get results using the specifed searx host
- [x] Prioritize returning an `answer` or results otherwise
- [ ] expose the field `infobox` when available
- [ ] expose `score` of result to help agent's decision
- [ ] expose the `suggestions` field to agents so they could try new
queries if no results are found with the orignial query ?
- [ ] Dynamic tool description for agents ?
- Searx offers many engines and a search syntax that agents can take
advantage of. It would be nice to generate a dynamic Tool description so
that it can be used many times as a tool but for different purposes.
- [x] Limit number of results
- [ ] Implement paging
- [x] Miror the usage of the Google Search tool
- [x] easy selection of search engines
- [x] Documentation
- [ ] update HowTo guide notebook on Search Tools
- [ ] Handle async
- [ ] Tests
### Add examples / documentation on possible uses with
- [ ] getting factual answers with `!wiki` option and `infoboxes`
- [ ] getting `suggestions`
- [ ] getting `corrections`
---------
Co-authored-by: blob42 <spike@w530>
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
Alternate implementation to PR #960 Again - only FAISS is implemented.
If accepted can add this to other vectorstores or leave as
NotImplemented? Suggestions welcome...
This PR updates `PromptLayerOpenAI` to now support requests using the
[Async
API](https://langchain.readthedocs.io/en/latest/modules/llms/async_llm.html)
It also updates the documentation on Async API to let users know that
PromptLayerOpenAI also supports this.
`PromptLayerOpenAI` now redefines `_agenerate` a similar was to how it
redefines `_generate`
Adds Google Search integration with [Serper](https://serper.dev) a
low-cost alternative to SerpAPI (10x cheaper + generous free tier).
Includes documentation, tests and examples. Hopefully I am not missing
anything.
Developers can sign up for a free account at
[serper.dev](https://serper.dev) and obtain an api key.
## Usage
```python
from langchain.utilities import GoogleSerperAPIWrapper
from langchain.llms.openai import OpenAI
from langchain.agents import initialize_agent, Tool
import os
os.environ["SERPER_API_KEY"] = ""
os.environ['OPENAI_API_KEY'] = ""
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0)
search = GoogleSerperAPIWrapper()
tools = [
Tool(
name="Intermediate Answer",
func=search.run
)
]
self_ask_with_search = initialize_agent(tools, llm, agent="self-ask-with-search", verbose=True)
self_ask_with_search.run("What is the hometown of the reigning men's U.S. Open champion?")
```
### Output
```
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Yes.
Follow up: Who is the reigning men's U.S. Open champion?
Intermediate answer: Current champions Carlos Alcaraz, 2022 men's singles champion.
Follow up: Where is Carlos Alcaraz from?
Intermediate answer: El Palmar, Spain
So the final answer is: El Palmar, Spain
> Finished chain.
'El Palmar, Spain'
```
This PR updates the usage instructions for PromptLayerOpenAI in
Langchain's documentation. The updated instructions provide more detail
and conform better to the style of other LLM integration documentation
pages.
No code changes were made in this PR, only improvements to the
documentation. This update will make it easier for users to understand
how to use `PromptLayerOpenAI`
Currently the chain is getting the column names and types on the one
side and the example rows on the other. It is easier for the llm to read
the table information if the column name and examples are shown together
so that it can easily understand to which columns do the examples refer
to. For an instantiation of this, please refer to the changes in the
`sqlite.ipynb` notebook.
Also changed `eval` for `ast.literal_eval` when interpreting the results
from the sample row query since it is a better practice.
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Ingham <>
---------
Co-authored-by: Francisco Ingham <fpingham@gmail.com>
The provided example uses the default `max_length` of `20` tokens, which
leads to the example generation getting cut off. 20 tokens is way too
short to show CoT reasoning, so I boosted it to `64`.
Without knowing HF's API well, it can be hard to figure out just where
those `model_kwargs` come from, and `max_length` is a super critical
one.
