Fix for: [Changed regex to cover new line before action
serious.](https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/3365)
---
This PR fixes the issue where `ValueError: Could not parse LLM output:`
was thrown on seems to be valid input.
Changed regex to cover new lines before action serious (after the
keywords "Action:" and "Action Input:").
regex101: https://regex101.com/r/CXl1kB/1
---------
Co-authored-by: msarskus <msarskus@cisco.com>
- Proactively raise error if a tool subclasses BaseTool, defines its
own schema, but fails to add the type-hints
- fix the auto-inferred schema of the decorator to strip the
unneeded virtual kwargs from the schema dict
Helps avoid silent instances of #3297
- Permit the specification of a `root_dir` to the read/write file tools
to specify a working directory
- Add validation for attempts to read/write outside the directory (e.g.,
through `../../` or symlinks or `/abs/path`'s that don't lie in the
correct path)
- Add some tests for all
One question is whether we should make a default root directory for
these? tradeoffs either way
`langchain.prompts.PromptTemplate` and
`langchain.prompts.FewShotPromptTemplate` do not validate
`input_variables` when initialized as `jinja2` template.
```python
# Using langchain v0.0.144
template = """"\
Your variable: {{ foo }}
{% if bar %}
You just set bar boolean variable to true
{% endif %}
"""
# Missing variable, should raise ValueError
prompt_template = PromptTemplate(template=template,
input_variables=["bar"],
template_format="jinja2",
validate_template=True)
# Extra variable, should raise ValueError
prompt_template = PromptTemplate(template=template,
input_variables=["bar", "foo", "extra", "thing"],
template_format="jinja2",
validate_template=True)
```
- Remove dynamic model creation in the `args()` property. _Only infer
for the decorator (and add an argument to NOT infer if someone wishes to
only pass as a string)_
- Update the validation example to make it less likely to be
misinterpreted as a "safe" way to run a repl
There is one example of "Multi-argument tools" in the custom_tools.ipynb
from yesterday, but we could add more. The output parsing for the base
MRKL agent hasn't been adapted to handle structured args at this point
in time
---------
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
`langchain.prompts.PromptTemplate` is unable to infer `input_variables`
from jinja2 template.
```python
# Using langchain v0.0.141
template_string = """\
Hello world
Your variable: {{ var }}
{# This will not get rendered #}
{% if verbose %}
Congrats! You just turned on verbose mode and got extra messages!
{% endif %}
"""
template = PromptTemplate.from_template(template_string, template_format="jinja2")
print(template.input_variables) # Output ['# This will not get rendered #', '% endif %', '% if verbose %']
```
---------
Co-authored-by: engkheng <ongengkheng929@example.com>
Add a time-weighted memory retriever and a notebook that approximates a
Generative Agent from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03442.pdf
The "daily plan" components are removed for now since they are less
useful without a virtual world, but the memory is an interesting
component to build off.
---------
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
Use numexpr evaluate instead of the python REPL to avoid malicious code
injection.
Tested against the (limited) math dataset and got the same score as
before.
For more permissive tools (like the REPL tool itself), other approaches
ought to be provided (some combination of Sanitizer + Restricted python
+ unprivileged-docker + ...), but for a calculator tool, only
mathematical expressions should be permitted.
See https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/814
When the code ran by the PythonAstREPLTool contains multiple statements
it will fallback to exec() instead of using eval(). With this change, it
will also return the output of the code in the same way the
PythonREPLTool will.
Currently, the output type of a number of OutputParser's `parse` methods
is `Any` when it can in fact be inferred.
This PR makes BaseOutputParser use a generic type and fixes the output
types of the following parsers:
- `PydanticOutputParser`
- `OutputFixingParser`
- `RetryOutputParser`
- `RetryWithErrorOutputParser`
The output of the `StructuredOutputParser` is corrected from `BaseModel`
to `Any` since there are no type guarantees provided by the parser.
Fixes issue #2715
`combine_docs` does not go through the standard chain call path which
means that chain callbacks won't be triggered, meaning QA chains won't
be traced properly, this fixes that.
Also fix several errors in the chat_vector_db notebook
Right now, eval chains require an answer for every question. It's
cumbersome to collect this ground truth so getting around this issue
with 2 things:
* Adding a context param in `ContextQAEvalChain` and simply evaluating
if the question is answered accurately from context
* Adding chain of though explanation prompting to improve the accuracy
of this w/o GT.
This also gets to feature parity with openai/evals which has the same
contextual eval w/o GT.
TODO in follow-up:
* Better prompt inheritance. No need for seperate prompt for CoT
reasoning. How can we merge them together
---------
Co-authored-by: Vashisht Madhavan <vashishtmadhavan@Vashs-MacBook-Pro.local>
This still doesn't handle the following
- non-JSON media types
- anyOf, allOf, oneOf's
And doesn't emit the typescript definitions for referred types yet, but
that can be saved for a separate PR.
Also, we could have better support for Swagger 2.0 specs and OpenAPI
3.0.3 (can use the same lib for the latter) recommend offline conversion
for now.
`AgentExecutor` already has support for limiting the number of
iterations. But the amount of time taken for each iteration can vary
quite a bit, so it is difficult to place limits on the execution time.
This PR adds a new field `max_execution_time` to the `AgentExecutor`
model. When called asynchronously, the agent loop is wrapped in an
`asyncio.timeout()` context which triggers the early stopping response
if the time limit is reached. When called synchronously, the agent loop
checks for both the max_iteration limit and the time limit after each
iteration.
When used asynchronously `max_execution_time` gives really tight control
over the max time for an execution chain. When used synchronously, the
chain can unfortunately exceed max_execution_time, but it still gives
more control than trying to estimate the number of max_iterations needed
to cap the execution time.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zachary Jones <zjones@zetaglobal.com>
This pull request adds an enum class for the various types of agents
used in the project, located in the `agent_types.py` file. Currently,
the project is using hardcoded strings for the initialization of these
agents, which can lead to errors and make the code harder to maintain.
With the introduction of the new enums, the code will be more readable
and less error-prone.
The new enum members include:
- ZERO_SHOT_REACT_DESCRIPTION
- REACT_DOCSTORE
- SELF_ASK_WITH_SEARCH
- CONVERSATIONAL_REACT_DESCRIPTION
- CHAT_ZERO_SHOT_REACT_DESCRIPTION
- CHAT_CONVERSATIONAL_REACT_DESCRIPTION
In this PR, I have also replaced the hardcoded strings with the
appropriate enum members throughout the codebase, ensuring a smooth
transition to the new approach.
Fix issue#1645: Parse either whitespace or newline after 'Action Input:'
in llm_output in mrkl agent.
Unittests added accordingly.
Co-authored-by: ₿ingnan.ΞTH <brillliantz@outlook.com>
I was getting the same issue reported in #1339 by
[MacYang555](https://github.com/MacYang555) when running the test suite
on my Mac. I implemented the fix they suggested to use a regex match in
the output assertion for the scenario under test.
Resolves#1339
Seeing a lot of issues in Discord in which the LLM is not using the
correct LIMIT clause for different SQL dialects. ie, it's using `LIMIT`
for mssql instead of `TOP`, or instead of `ROWNUM` for Oracle, etc.
I think this could be due to us specifying the LIMIT statement in the
example rows portion of `table_info`. So the LLM is seeing the `LIMIT`
statement used in the prompt.
Since we can't specify each dialect's method here, I think it's fine to
just replace the `SELECT... LIMIT 3;` statement with `3 rows from
table_name table:`, and wrap everything in a block comment directly
following the `CREATE` statement. The Rajkumar et al paper wrapped the
example rows and `SELECT` statement in a block comment as well anyway.
Thoughts @fpingham?
This class enables us to send a dictionary containing an output key and
the expected format, which in turn allows us to retrieve the result of
the matching formats and extract specific information from it.
To exclude irrelevant information from our return dictionary, we can
prompt the LLM to use a specific command that notifies us when it
doesn't know the answer. We refer to this variable as the
"no_update_value".
Regarding the updated regular expression pattern
(r"{}:\s?([^.'\n']*).?"), it enables us to retrieve a format as 'Output
Key':'value'.
We have improved the regex by adding an optional space between ':' and
'value' with "s?", and by excluding points and line jumps from the
matches using "[^.'\n']*".
