From 424a573266c848fe2e53bc2d50c2dc7fc72f2c15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffrey Zheng Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 01:24:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] DOC: Misspelling in agents.rst documentation (#5038) # Corrected Misspelling in agents.rst Documentation In the [documentation](https://python.langchain.com/en/latest/modules/agents.html) it says "in fact, it is often best to have an Action Agent be in **change** of the execution for the Plan and Execute agent." **Suggested Change:** I propose correcting change to charge. Fix for issue: #5039 --- docs/modules/agents.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/modules/agents.rst b/docs/modules/agents.rst index 36ce8841..2d675101 100644 --- a/docs/modules/agents.rst +++ b/docs/modules/agents.rst @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ At the moment, there are two main types of agents: When should you use each one? Action Agents are more conventional, and good for small tasks. For more complex or long running tasks, the initial planning step helps to maintain long term objectives and focus. However, that comes at the expense of generally more calls and higher latency. -These two agents are also not mutually exclusive - in fact, it is often best to have an Action Agent be in change of the execution for the Plan and Execute agent. +These two agents are also not mutually exclusive - in fact, it is often best to have an Action Agent be in charge of the execution for the Plan and Execute agent. Action Agents -------------