<p>[<code>xplr</code>][xplr] prefers to stay minimal, both in terms of features and binary
size, but just like speed, minimalism isn't as aggressively pursued as
configurability. If adding some feature, lines of code, or a dependency allows
the users to be a little more productive or allows [<code>xplr</code>][xplr] to be a
little more configurable, it will be considered. But of-course, the <code>bulk vs productivity gain per user</code> balance will also be considered in the
decision-making.</p>
<p>xplr prefers to stay minimal, both in terms of features and binary size, but
just like speed, minimalism isn't as aggressively pursued as configurability.
If adding some feature, lines of code, or a dependency allows the users to be a
little more productive or allows xplr to be a little more configurable, it will
be considered. But of-course, the <code>bulk vs productivity gain per user</code> balance
will also be considered in the decision-making.</p>
<p>[<code>xplr</code>][xplr] prefers to stay minimal, both in terms of features and binary
size, but just like speed, minimalism isn't as aggressively pursued as
configurability. If adding some feature, lines of code, or a dependency allows
the users to be a little more productive or allows [<code>xplr</code>][xplr] to be a
little more configurable, it will be considered. But of-course, the <code>bulk vs productivity gain per user</code> balance will also be considered in the
decision-making.</p>
<p>xplr prefers to stay minimal, both in terms of features and binary size, but
just like speed, minimalism isn't as aggressively pursued as configurability.
If adding some feature, lines of code, or a dependency allows the users to be a
little more productive or allows xplr to be a little more configurable, it will
be considered. But of-course, the <code>bulk vs productivity gain per user</code> balance
will also be considered in the decision-making.</p>
<p>[<code>xplr</code>][xplr] prefers to stay minimal, both in terms of features and binary
size, but just like speed, minimalism isn't as aggressively pursued as
configurability. If adding some feature, lines of code, or a dependency allows
the users to be a little more productive or allows [<code>xplr</code>][xplr] to be a
little more configurable, it will be considered. But of-course, the <code>bulk vs productivity gain per user</code> balance will also be considered in the
decision-making.</p>
<p>xplr prefers to stay minimal, both in terms of features and binary size, but
just like speed, minimalism isn't as aggressively pursued as configurability.
If adding some feature, lines of code, or a dependency allows the users to be a
little more productive or allows xplr to be a little more configurable, it will
be considered. But of-course, the <code>bulk vs productivity gain per user</code> balance
will also be considered in the decision-making.</p>