smallstep-certificates/pki/pki_test.go
Herman Slatman 2e560caf68
Add some basic tests for GenerateConfig
So far the `GenerateConfig` method wasn't tested. This commit adds
a couple of basic tests for this method. It's not fully covered yet,
nor are all properties being checked, but it provides a starting
point for refactoring the CA (configuration) initialization process.
2023-10-02 15:58:31 +02:00

314 lines
9.1 KiB
Go

package pki
import (
"context"
"path/filepath"
"testing"
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/admin"
admindb "github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/admin/db/nosql"
authconfig "github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/config"
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/authority/provisioner"
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/cas/apiv1"
"github.com/smallstep/certificates/db"
"github.com/smallstep/nosql"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"go.step.sm/cli-utils/step"
)
func withDBDataSource(t *testing.T, dataSource string) func(c *authconfig.Config) error {
return func(c *authconfig.Config) error {
if c == nil || c.DB == nil {
require.Fail(t, "withDBDataSource prerequisites not met")
}
c.DB.DataSource = dataSource
return nil
}
}
func TestPKI_GenerateConfig(t *testing.T) {
var preparePKI = func(t *testing.T, opts ...Option) *PKI {
o := apiv1.Options{
Type: "softcas",
IsCreator: true,
}
// TODO(hs): invoking `New` doesn't perform all operations that are executed
// when `ca init` is executed. Ideally this logic should be handled in one
// place and probably inside of the PKI initialization. For testing purposes
// the missing operations are faked by `setKeyPair`.
p, err := New(o, opts...)
require.NoError(t, err)
// setKeyPair sets a predefined JWK and a default JWK provisioner. This is one
// of the things performed in the `ca init` code that's not part of `New`, but
// performed after that in p.GenerateKeyPairs`. We're currently using the same
// JWK for every test to keep test variance small: we're not testing JWK generation
// here after all. It's a bit dangerous to redefine the function here, but it's
// the simplest way to make this fully testable without refactoring the init now.
// The password for the predefined encrypted key is \x01\x03\x03\x07.
setKeyPair(t, p)
return p
}
type args struct {
opt []ConfigOption
}
type test struct {
pki *PKI
args args
want *authconfig.Config
wantErr bool
}
var tests = map[string]func(t *testing.T) test{
"ok/simple": func(t *testing.T) test {
pki := preparePKI(t)
pki.options.deploymentType = StandaloneDeployment
pki.options.provisioner = "default-prov"
return test{
pki: pki,
args: args{
[]ConfigOption{},
},
want: &authconfig.Config{
Address: "127.0.0.1:9000",
InsecureAddress: "",
DNSNames: []string{"127.0.0.1"},
AuthorityConfig: &authconfig.AuthConfig{
DeploymentType: "", // TODO(hs): (why is) this is not set to standalone?
EnableAdmin: false,
Provisioners: provisioner.List{
&provisioner.JWK{
Type: "JWK",
Name: "default-prov",
},
},
},
DB: &db.Config{
Type: "badgerv2",
DataSource: filepath.Join(step.Path(), "db"),
},
},
wantErr: false,
}
},
"ok/with-acme": func(t *testing.T) test {
pki := preparePKI(t)
pki.options.deploymentType = StandaloneDeployment
pki.options.provisioner = "default-prov"
pki.options.enableACME = true
return test{
pki: pki,
args: args{
[]ConfigOption{},
},
want: &authconfig.Config{
Address: "127.0.0.1:9000",
InsecureAddress: "",
DNSNames: []string{"127.0.0.1"},
AuthorityConfig: &authconfig.AuthConfig{
DeploymentType: "", // TODO(hs): (why is) this is not set to standalone?
EnableAdmin: false,
Provisioners: provisioner.List{
&provisioner.JWK{
Type: "JWK",
Name: "default-prov",
},
&provisioner.ACME{
Type: "ACME",
Name: "acme",
},
},
},
DB: &db.Config{
Type: "badgerv2",
DataSource: filepath.Join(step.Path(), "db"),
},
},
wantErr: false,
}
},
"ok/with-acme-and-double-provisioner-name": func(t *testing.T) test {
pki := preparePKI(t)
pki.options.deploymentType = StandaloneDeployment
pki.options.provisioner = "acme"
pki.options.enableACME = true
return test{
pki: pki,
args: args{
[]ConfigOption{},
},
want: &authconfig.Config{
Address: "127.0.0.1:9000",
InsecureAddress: "",
DNSNames: []string{"127.0.0.1"},
AuthorityConfig: &authconfig.AuthConfig{
DeploymentType: "", // TODO(hs): (why is) this is not set to standalone?
EnableAdmin: false,
Provisioners: provisioner.List{
&provisioner.JWK{
Type: "JWK",
Name: "acme",
},
&provisioner.ACME{
Type: "ACME",
Name: "acme-1",
},
},
},
DB: &db.Config{
Type: "badgerv2",
DataSource: filepath.Join(step.Path(), "db"),
},
},
wantErr: false,
}
},
"ok/with-ssh": func(t *testing.T) test {
pki := preparePKI(t)
pki.options.deploymentType = StandaloneDeployment
pki.options.provisioner = "default-prov"
pki.options.enableSSH = true
return test{
pki: pki,
args: args{
[]ConfigOption{},
},
want: &authconfig.Config{
Address: "127.0.0.1:9000",
InsecureAddress: "",
DNSNames: []string{"127.0.0.1"},
AuthorityConfig: &authconfig.AuthConfig{
DeploymentType: "", // TODO(hs): (why is) this is not set to standalone?
EnableAdmin: false,
Provisioners: provisioner.List{
&provisioner.JWK{
Type: "JWK",
Name: "default-prov",
},
&provisioner.SSHPOP{
Type: "SSHPOP",
Name: "sshpop",
},
},
},
DB: &db.Config{
Type: "badgerv2",
DataSource: filepath.Join(step.Path(), "db"),
},
},
wantErr: false,
}
},
"ok/with-ssh-and-double-provisioner-name": func(t *testing.T) test {
pki := preparePKI(t)
pki.options.deploymentType = StandaloneDeployment
pki.options.provisioner = "sshpop"
pki.options.enableSSH = true
return test{
pki: pki,
args: args{
[]ConfigOption{},
},
want: &authconfig.Config{
Address: "127.0.0.1:9000",
InsecureAddress: "",
DNSNames: []string{"127.0.0.1"},
AuthorityConfig: &authconfig.AuthConfig{
DeploymentType: "", // TODO(hs): (why is) this is not set to standalone?
EnableAdmin: false,
Provisioners: provisioner.List{
&provisioner.JWK{
Type: "JWK",
Name: "sshpop",
},
&provisioner.SSHPOP{
Type: "SSHPOP",
Name: "sshpop-1",
},
},
},
DB: &db.Config{
Type: "badgerv2",
DataSource: filepath.Join(step.Path(), "db"),
},
},
wantErr: false,
}
},
"ok/with-admin": func(t *testing.T) test {
pki := preparePKI(t)
pki.options.deploymentType = StandaloneDeployment
pki.options.provisioner = "default-prov"
pki.options.enableAdmin = true
tempDir := t.TempDir()
return test{
pki: pki,
args: args{
[]ConfigOption{withDBDataSource(t, filepath.Join(tempDir, "db"))},
},
want: &authconfig.Config{
Address: "127.0.0.1:9000",
InsecureAddress: "",
DNSNames: []string{"127.0.0.1"},
AuthorityConfig: &authconfig.AuthConfig{
DeploymentType: "", // TODO(hs): (why is) this is not set to standalone?
EnableAdmin: true,
Provisioners: provisioner.List{}, // when admin is enabled, provisioner list is expected to be empty
},
DB: &db.Config{
Type: "badgerv2",
DataSource: filepath.Join(tempDir, "db"),
},
},
wantErr: false,
}
},
}
for name, run := range tests {
tc := run(t)
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
got, err := tc.pki.GenerateConfig(tc.args.opt...)
if tc.wantErr {
assert.NotNil(t, err)
assert.Nil(t, got)
return
}
assert.Nil(t, err)
if assert.NotNil(t, got) {
assert.Equal(t, tc.want.Address, got.Address)
assert.Equal(t, tc.want.InsecureAddress, got.InsecureAddress)
assert.Equal(t, tc.want.DNSNames, got.DNSNames)
assert.Equal(t, tc.want.DB, got.DB)
if assert.NotNil(t, tc.want.AuthorityConfig) {
assert.Equal(t, tc.want.AuthorityConfig.DeploymentType, got.AuthorityConfig.DeploymentType)
assert.Equal(t, tc.want.AuthorityConfig.EnableAdmin, got.AuthorityConfig.EnableAdmin)
if numberOfProvisioners := len(tc.want.AuthorityConfig.Provisioners); numberOfProvisioners > 0 {
if assert.Len(t, got.AuthorityConfig.Provisioners, numberOfProvisioners) {
for i, p := range tc.want.AuthorityConfig.Provisioners {
assert.Equal(t, p.GetType(), got.AuthorityConfig.Provisioners[i].GetType())
assert.Equal(t, p.GetName(), got.AuthorityConfig.Provisioners[i].GetName())
}
}
}
if tc.want.AuthorityConfig.EnableAdmin {
_db, err := db.New(tc.want.DB)
require.NoError(t, err)
defer _db.Shutdown()
adminDB, err := admindb.New(_db.(nosql.DB), admin.DefaultAuthorityID)
require.NoError(t, err)
provs, err := adminDB.GetProvisioners(context.Background())
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.NotEmpty(t, provs) // currently about the best we can do in terms of checks
}
}
}
})
}
}