This commit is contained in:
DoTheEvo 2024-06-05 20:12:14 +02:00
parent df00062028
commit 5cb53f26d3

View File

@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Is it worth investing time and hardware?
Modern commercial camera systems offer similar AI aided objects
detection, while maintaining the configurability. Phone apps are also often
far better.<br>
Meanwhile Frigate lacks even proper ptz control.
Meanwhile Frigate just recently got even basic ptz control.
One should view it as a few people hobby project on github,
though exceptionally well done.
@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ My opinion
\- Cheap and outdoor, enough settings to feel fine.
It actually decently see at night without IR, but you realize its kinda lie
as if something moves there its a smudge at best or invisible predator at worst.
* Some random aliexpress camera given to me, it has ptz.
* [VIGI C540V](https://www.tp-link.com/us/business-networking/vigi-network-camera/vigi-c540v/)
\- A recent addition. A PTZ camera with zoom, frigate yet does not support zoom.
PTZ setup is seen in the very last config.
Once I am running frigate and cameras for some real time... more than a year,
I will decide which cameras to get long term.
@ -753,6 +755,9 @@ WHERE
# My current config
3rd camera has ptz enabled by having onvif section. [Documentation](https://docs.frigate.video/configuration/autotracking/).<br>
Unfortunately env variables dont work there yet so plaintext values need to be set.
<details>
<summary><b><font size="+1">current_config.yml</font></b></summary>
@ -796,11 +801,11 @@ objects:
record:
enabled: true
retain:
days: 60
days: 30
mode: all
events:
retain:
default: 360
default: 60
mode: motion
snapshots:
@ -812,6 +817,8 @@ snapshots:
birdseye:
mode: continuous
layout:
scaling_factor: 1.0
cameras:
K1-Gate:
@ -847,31 +854,31 @@ cameras:
objects:
filters:
cat:
min_score: 0.3
threshold: 0.5
min_score: 0.2
threshold: 0.4
motion:
mask:
- 640,78,640,0,0,0,0,480,316,480,452,171
K3-Dvor:
birdseye:
order: 3
ffmpeg:
inputs:
- path: rtsp://10.0.19.43:554/0/av1
- path: rtsp://{FRIGATE_RTSP_USER}:{FRIGATE_RTSP_PASSWORD}@10.0.19.43:554/stream1
roles:
- record
- path: rtsp://10.0.19.43:554/0/av1
- path: rtsp://{FRIGATE_RTSP_USER}:{FRIGATE_RTSP_PASSWORD}@10.0.19.43:554/stream2
roles:
- detect
detect:
width: 640
height: 352
fps: 8
motion:
mask:
- 0,37,179,30,174,0,0,0
- 591,108,570,0,640,0,640,352,344,352
height: 480
fps: 5
onvif:
host: 10.0.19.43
port: 2020
user: admin
password: plaintextpasswordhere
```
</details>
@ -884,7 +891,6 @@ Not much different from the 4th config at this moment.<br>
* person detection threshold increased globaly
* cat detection treshold and [min_score](https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/issues/6795#issuecomment-1591076029)
decreased for the 2nd camera, testing phase
* 3rd crappy ptz camera is present
# Update