welcome_message = """Is this your first time? Don't worry, Rustlings was made for beginners! We are going to teach you a lot of things about Rust, but before we can get started, here's a couple of notes about how Rustlings operates: 1. The central concept behind Rustlings is that you solve exercises. These exercises usually have some sort of syntax error in them, which will cause them to fail compilation or testing. Sometimes there's a logic error instead of a syntax error. No matter what error, it's your job to find it and fix it! You'll know when you fixed it because then, the exercise will compile and Rustlings will be able to move on to the next exercise. 2. If you run Rustlings in watch mode (which we recommend), it'll automatically start with the first exercise. Don't get confused by an error message popping up as soon as you run Rustlings! This is part of the exercise that you're supposed to solve, so open the exercise file in an editor and start your detective work! 3. If you're stuck on an exercise, there is a helpful hint you can view by typing 'hint' (in watch mode), or running `rustlings hint exercise_name`. 4. If an exercise doesn't make sense to you, feel free to open an issue on GitHub! (https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/issues/new). We look at every issue, and sometimes, other learners do too so you can help each other out! Got all that? Great! To get started, run `rustlings watch` in order to get the first exercise. Make sure to have your editor open in the `rustlings` directory!""" final_message = """We hope you enjoyed learning about the various aspects of Rust! If you noticed any issues, please don't hesitate to report them to our repo. You can also contribute your own exercises to help the greater community! Before reporting an issue or contributing, please read our guidelines: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md """ # INTRO [[exercises]] name = "intro1" path = "exercises/00_intro/intro1.rs" mode = "compile" # TODO: Fix hint hint = """ Remove the `I AM NOT DONE` comment in the `exercises/intro00/intro1.rs` file to move on to the next exercise.""" [[exercises]] name = "intro2" path = "exercises/00_intro/intro2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ The compiler is informing us that we've got the name of the print macro wrong, and has suggested an alternative.""" # VARIABLES [[exercises]] name = "variables1" path = "exercises/01_variables/variables1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ The declaration in the first line in the main function is missing a keyword that is needed in Rust to create a new variable binding.""" [[exercises]] name = "variables2" path = "exercises/01_variables/variables2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ The compiler message is saying that Rust cannot infer the type that the variable binding `x` has with what is given here. What happens if you annotate the first line in the main function with a type annotation? What if you give `x` a value? What if you do both? What type should `x` be, anyway? What if `x` is the same type as `10`? What if it's a different type?""" [[exercises]] name = "variables3" path = "exercises/01_variables/variables3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Oops! In this exercise, we have a variable binding that we've created on in the first line in the `main` function, and we're trying to use it in the next line, but we haven't given it a value. We can't print out something that isn't there; try giving `x` a value! This is an error that can cause bugs that's very easy to make in any programming language -- thankfully the Rust compiler has caught this for us!""" [[exercises]] name = "variables4" path = "exercises/01_variables/variables4.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ In Rust, variable bindings are immutable by default. But here we're trying to reassign a different value to `x`! There's a keyword we can use to make a variable binding mutable instead.""" [[exercises]] name = "variables5" path = "exercises/01_variables/variables5.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ In `variables4` we already learned how to make an immutable variable mutable using a special keyword. Unfortunately this doesn't help us much in this exercise because we want to assign a different typed value to an existing variable. Sometimes you may also like to reuse existing variable names because you are just converting values to different types like in this exercise. Fortunately Rust has a powerful solution to this problem: 'Shadowing'! You can read more about 'Shadowing' in the book's section 'Variables and Mutability': https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch03-01-variables-and-mutability.html#shadowing Try to solve this exercise afterwards using this technique.""" [[exercises]] name = "variables6" path = "exercises/01_variables/variables6.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ We know about variables and mutability, but there is another important type of variable available: constants. Constants are always immutable and they are declared with keyword `const` rather than keyword `let`. Constants types must also always be annotated. Read more about constants and the differences between variables and constants under 'Constants' in the book's section 'Variables and Mutability': https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch03-01-variables-and-mutability.html#constants """ # FUNCTIONS [[exercises]] name = "functions1" path = "exercises/02_functions/functions1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ This main function is calling a function that it expects to exist, but the function doesn't exist. It expects this function to have the name `call_me`. It expects this function to not take any arguments and not return a value. Sounds a lot like `main`, doesn't it?""" [[exercises]] name = "functions2" path = "exercises/02_functions/functions2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Rust requires that all parts of a function's signature have type annotations, but `call_me` is missing the type annotation of `num`.""" [[exercises]] name = "functions3" path = "exercises/02_functions/functions3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ This time, the function *declaration* is okay, but there's something wrong with the place where we're calling the function.""" [[exercises]] name = "functions4" path = "exercises/02_functions/functions4.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ The error message points to the function `sale_price` and says it expects a type after the `->`. This is where the function's return type should be -- take a look at the `is_even` function for an example! Also: Did you figure out that, technically, `u32` would be the more fitting type for the inputs of the functions here, since the original prices shouldn't be negative? If so, kudos!""" [[exercises]] name = "functions5" path = "exercises/02_functions/functions5.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ This is a really common error that can be fixed by removing one character. It happens because Rust distinguishes between expressions and statements: expressions return a value based on their operand(s), and statements simply return a `()` type which behaves just like `void` in C/C++ language. We want to return a value of `i32` type from the `square` function, but it is returning a `()` type... They are not the same. There are two solutions: 1. Add a `return` ahead of `num * num;` 2. remove `;`, make it to be `num * num`""" # IF [[exercises]] name = "if1" path = "exercises/03_if/if1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ It's possible to do this in one line if you would like! Some similar examples from other languages: - In C(++) this would be: `a > b ? a : b` - In Python this would be: `a if a > b else b` Remember in Rust that: - the `if` condition does not need to be surrounded by parentheses - `if`/`else` conditionals are expressions - Each condition is followed by a `{}` block.""" [[exercises]] name = "if2" path = "exercises/03_if/if2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ For that first compiler error, it's important in Rust that each conditional block returns the same type! To get the tests passing, you will need a couple conditions checking different input values.""" [[exercises]] name = "if3" path = "exercises/03_if/if3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ In Rust, every arm of an `if` expression has to return the same type of value. Make sure the type is consistent across all arms.""" # QUIZ 1 [[exercises]] name = "quiz1" path = "exercises/quiz1.rs" mode = "test" hint = "No hints this time ;)" # PRIMITIVE TYPES [[exercises]] name = "primitive_types1" path = "exercises/04_primitive_types/primitive_types1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = "No hints this time ;)" [[exercises]] name = "primitive_types2" path = "exercises/04_primitive_types/primitive_types2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = "No hints this time ;)" [[exercises]] name = "primitive_types3" path = "exercises/04_primitive_types/primitive_types3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ There's a shorthand to initialize Arrays with a certain size that does not require you to type in 100 items (but you certainly can if you want!). For example, you can do: ``` let array = ["Are we there yet?"; 10]; ``` Bonus: what are some other things you could have that would return `true` for `a.len() >= 100`?""" [[exercises]] name = "primitive_types4" path = "exercises/04_primitive_types/primitive_types4.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Take a look at the 'Understanding Ownership -> Slices -> Other Slices' section of the book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-03-slices.html and use the starting and ending (plus one) indices of the items in the `Array` that you want to end up in the slice. If you're curious why the first argument of `assert_eq!` does not have an ampersand for a reference since the second argument is a reference, take a look at the coercion chapter of the nomicon: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/coercions.html""" [[exercises]] name = "primitive_types5" path = "exercises/04_primitive_types/primitive_types5.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Take a look at the 'Data Types -> The Tuple Type' section of the book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch03-02-data-types.html#the-tuple-type Particularly the part about destructuring (second to last example in the section). You'll need to make a pattern to bind `name` and `age` to the appropriate parts of the tuple. You can do it!!""" [[exercises]] name = "primitive_types6" path = "exercises/04_primitive_types/primitive_types6.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ While you could use a destructuring `let` for the tuple here, try indexing into it instead, as explained in the last example of the 'Data Types -> The Tuple Type' section of the book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch03-02-data-types.html#the-tuple-type Now you have another tool in your toolbox!""" # VECS [[exercises]] name = "vecs1" path = "exercises/05_vecs/vecs1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ In Rust, there are two ways to define a Vector. 1. One way is to use the `Vec::new()` function to create a new vector and fill it with the `push()` method. 2. The second way, which is simpler is to use the `vec![]` macro and define your elements inside the square brackets. Check this chapter: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch08-01-vectors.html of the Rust book to learn more. """ [[exercises]] name = "vecs2" path = "exercises/05_vecs/vecs2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ In the first function we are looping over the Vector and getting a reference to one `element` at a time. To modify the value of that `element` we need to use the `*` dereference operator. You can learn more in this chapter of the Rust book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch08-01-vectors.html#iterating-over-the-values-in-a-vector In the second function this dereferencing is not necessary, because the `map` function expects the new value to be returned. After you've completed both functions, decide for yourself which approach you like better. What do you think is the more commonly used pattern under Rust developers? """ # MOVE SEMANTICS [[exercises]] name = "move_semantics1" path = "exercises/06_move_semantics/move_semantics1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ So you've got the "cannot borrow immutable local variable `vec` as mutable" error on the line where we push an element to the vector, right? The fix for this is going to be adding one keyword, and the addition is NOT on the line where we push to the vector (where the error is). Also: Try accessing `vec0` after having called `fill_vec()`. See what happens!""" [[exercises]] name = "move_semantics2" path = "exercises/06_move_semantics/move_semantics2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ When running this exercise for the first time, you'll notice an error about "borrow of moved value". In Rust, when an argument is passed to a function and it's not explicitly returned, you can't use the original variable anymore. We call this "moving" a variable. When we pass `vec0` into `fill_vec`, it's being "moved" into `vec1`, meaning we can't access `vec0` anymore after the fact. Rust provides a couple of different ways to mitigate this issue, feel free to try them all: 1. You could make another, separate version of the data that's in `vec0` and pass that to `fill_vec` instead. 2. Make `fill_vec` borrow its argument instead of taking ownership of it, and then copy the data within the function (`vec.clone()`) in order to return an owned `Vec`. """ [[exercises]] name = "move_semantics3" path = "exercises/06_move_semantics/move_semantics3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ The difference between this one and the previous ones is that the first line of `fn fill_vec` that had `let mut vec = vec;` is no longer there. You can, instead of adding that line back, add `mut` in one place that will change an existing binding to be a mutable binding instead of an immutable one :)""" [[exercises]] name = "move_semantics4" path = "exercises/06_move_semantics/move_semantics4.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Stop reading whenever you feel like you have enough direction :) Or try doing one step and then fixing the compiler errors that result! So the end goal is to: - get rid of the first line in main that creates the new vector - so then `vec0` doesn't exist, so we can't pass it to `fill_vec` - `fill_vec` has had its signature changed, which our call should reflect - since we're not creating a new vec in `main` anymore, we need to create a new vec in `fill_vec`, and fill it with the expected values""" [[exercises]] name = "move_semantics5" path = "exercises/06_move_semantics/move_semantics5.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Carefully reason about the range in which each mutable reference is in scope. Does it help to update the value of referent (`x`) immediately after the mutable reference is taken? Read more about 'Mutable References' in the book's section 'References and Borrowing': https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-02-references-and-borrowing.html#mutable-references. """ [[exercises]] name = "move_semantics6" path = "exercises/06_move_semantics/move_semantics6.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ To find the answer, you can consult the book section "References and Borrowing": https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch04-02-references-and-borrowing.html The first problem is that `get_char` is taking ownership of the string. So `data` is moved and can't be used for `string_uppercase`. `data` is moved to `get_char` first, meaning that `string_uppercase` cannot manipulate the data. Once you've fixed that, `string_uppercase`'s function signature will also need to be adjusted. Can you figure out how? Another hint: it has to do with the `&` character.""" # STRUCTS [[exercises]] name = "structs1" path = "exercises/07_structs/structs1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Rust has more than one type of struct. Three actually, all variants are used to package related data together. There are normal (or classic) structs. These are named collections of related data stored in fields. Tuple structs are basically just named tuples. Finally, Unit-like structs. These don't have any fields and are useful for generics. In this exercise you need to complete and implement one of each kind. Read more about structs in The Book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch05-01-defining-structs.html""" [[exercises]] name = "structs2" path = "exercises/07_structs/structs2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Creating instances of structs is easy, all you need to do is assign some values to its fields. There are however some shortcuts that can be taken when instantiating structs. Have a look in The Book, to find out more: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch05-01-defining-structs.html#creating-instances-from-other-instances-with-struct-update-syntax""" [[exercises]] name = "structs3" path = "exercises/07_structs/structs3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ For `is_international`: What makes a package international? Seems related to the places it goes through right? For `get_fees`: This method takes an additional argument, is there a field in the `Package` struct that this relates to? Have a look in The Book, to find out more about method implementations: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch05-03-method-syntax.html""" # ENUMS [[exercises]] name = "enums1" path = "exercises/08_enums/enums1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = "No hints this time ;)" [[exercises]] name = "enums2" path = "exercises/08_enums/enums2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ You can create enumerations that have different variants with different types such as no data, anonymous structs, a single string, tuples, ...etc""" [[exercises]] name = "enums3" path = "exercises/08_enums/enums3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ As a first step, you can define enums to compile this code without errors. And then create a match expression in `process()`. Note that you need to deconstruct some message variants in the match expression to get value in the variant.""" # STRINGS [[exercises]] name = "strings1" path = "exercises/09_strings/strings1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ The `current_favorite_color` function is currently returning a string slice with the `'static` lifetime. We know this because the data of the string lives in our code itself -- it doesn't come from a file or user input or another program -- so it will live as long as our program lives. But it is still a string slice. There's one way to create a `String` by converting a string slice covered in the Strings chapter of the book, and another way that uses the `From` trait.""" [[exercises]] name = "strings2" path = "exercises/09_strings/strings2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Yes, it would be really easy to fix this by just changing the value bound to `word` to be a string slice instead of a `String`, wouldn't it?? There is a way to add one character to the `if` statement, though, that will coerce the `String` into a string slice. Side note: If you're interested in learning about how this kind of reference conversion works, you can jump ahead in the book and read this part in the smart pointers chapter: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch15-02-deref.html#implicit-deref-coercions-with-functions-and-methods""" [[exercises]] name = "strings3" path = "exercises/09_strings/strings3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ There's tons of useful standard library functions for strings. Let's try and use some of them: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/string/struct.String.html#method.trim For the `compose_me` method: You can either use the `format!` macro, or convert the string slice into an owned string, which you can then freely extend.""" [[exercises]] name = "strings4" path = "exercises/09_strings/strings4.rs" mode = "compile" hint = "No hints this time ;)" # MODULES [[exercises]] name = "modules1" path = "exercises/10_modules/modules1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Everything is private in Rust by default-- but there's a keyword we can use to make something public! The compiler error should point to the thing that needs to be public.""" [[exercises]] name = "modules2" path = "exercises/10_modules/modules2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ The delicious_snacks module is trying to present an external interface that is different than its internal structure (the `fruits` and `veggies` modules and associated constants). Complete the `use` statements to fit the uses in main and find the one keyword missing for both constants. Learn more at https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch07-04-bringing-paths-into-scope-with-the-use-keyword.html#re-exporting-names-with-pub-use""" [[exercises]] name = "modules3" path = "exercises/10_modules/modules3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ `UNIX_EPOCH` and `SystemTime` are declared in the `std::time` module. Add a `use` statement for these two to bring them into scope. You can use nested paths or the glob operator to bring these two in using only one line.""" # HASHMAPS [[exercises]] name = "hashmaps1" path = "exercises/11_hashmaps/hashmaps1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Hint 1: Take a look at the return type of the function to figure out the type for the `basket`. Hint 2: Number of fruits should be at least 5. And you have to put at least three different types of fruits. """ [[exercises]] name = "hashmaps2" path = "exercises/11_hashmaps/hashmaps2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Use the `entry()` and `or_insert()` methods of `HashMap` to achieve this. Learn more at https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch08-03-hash-maps.html#only-inserting-a-value-if-the-key-has-no-value """ [[exercises]] name = "hashmaps3" path = "exercises/11_hashmaps/hashmaps3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Hint 1: Use the `entry()` and `or_insert()` methods of `HashMap` to insert entries corresponding to each team in the scores table. Learn more at https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch08-03-hash-maps.html#only-inserting-a-value-if-the-key-has-no-value Hint 2: If there is already an entry for a given key, the value returned by `entry()` can be updated based on the existing value. Learn more at https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch08-03-hash-maps.html#updating-a-value-based-on-the-old-value """ # QUIZ 2 [[exercises]] name = "quiz2" path = "exercises/quiz2.rs" mode = "test" hint = "No hints this time ;)" # OPTIONS [[exercises]] name = "options1" path = "exercises/12_options/options1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Options can have a `Some` value, with an inner value, or a `None` value, without an inner value. There's multiple ways to get at the inner value, you can use `unwrap`, or pattern match. Unwrapping is the easiest, but how do you do it safely so that it doesn't panic in your face later?""" [[exercises]] name = "options2" path = "exercises/12_options/options2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Check out: - https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/flow_control/if_let.html - https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/flow_control/while_let.html Remember that `Option`s can be stacked in `if let` and `while let`. For example: `Some(Some(variable)) = variable2` Also see `Option::flatten` """ [[exercises]] name = "options3" path = "exercises/12_options/options3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ The compiler says a partial move happened in the `match` statement. How can this be avoided? The compiler shows the correction needed. After making the correction as suggested by the compiler, do read: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/keyword.ref.html""" # ERROR HANDLING [[exercises]] name = "errors1" path = "exercises/13_error_handling/errors1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ `Ok` and `Err` are the two variants of `Result`, so what the tests are saying is that `generate_nametag_text` should return a `Result` instead of an `Option`. To make this change, you'll need to: - update the return type in the function signature to be a `Result` that could be the variants `Ok(String)` and `Err(String)` - change the body of the function to return `Ok(stuff)` where it currently returns `Some(stuff)` - change the body of the function to return `Err(error message)` where it currently returns `None`""" [[exercises]] name = "errors2" path = "exercises/13_error_handling/errors2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ One way to handle this is using a `match` statement on `item_quantity.parse::()` where the cases are `Ok(something)` and `Err(something)`. This pattern is very common in Rust, though, so there's a `?` operator that does pretty much what you would make that match statement do for you! Take a look at this section of the 'Error Handling' chapter: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-the--operator and give it a try!""" [[exercises]] name = "errors3" path = "exercises/13_error_handling/errors3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ If other functions can return a `Result`, why shouldn't `main`? It's a fairly common convention to return something like `Result<(), ErrorType>` from your main function. The unit (`()`) type is there because nothing is really needed in terms of positive results.""" [[exercises]] name = "errors4" path = "exercises/13_error_handling/errors4.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ `PositiveNonzeroInteger::new` is always creating a new instance and returning an `Ok` result. It should be doing some checking, returning an `Err` result if those checks fail, and only returning an `Ok` result if those checks determine that everything is... okay :)""" [[exercises]] name = "errors5" path = "exercises/13_error_handling/errors5.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ There are two different possible `Result` types produced within `main()`, which are propagated using `?` operators. How do we declare a return type from `main()` that allows both? Under the hood, the `?` operator calls `From::from` on the error value to convert it to a boxed trait object, a `Box`. This boxed trait object is polymorphic, and since all errors implement the `error::Error` trait, we can capture lots of different errors in one "Box" object. Check out this section of the book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch09-02-recoverable-errors-with-result.html#a-shortcut-for-propagating-errors-the--operator Read more about boxing errors: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/boxing_errors.html Read more about using the `?` operator with boxed errors: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/reenter_question_mark.html """ [[exercises]] name = "errors6" path = "exercises/13_error_handling/errors6.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ This exercise uses a completed version of `PositiveNonzeroInteger` from errors4. Below the line that `TODO` asks you to change, there is an example of using the `map_err()` method on a `Result` to transform one type of error into another. Try using something similar on the `Result` from `parse()`. You might use the `?` operator to return early from the function, or you might use a `match` expression, or maybe there's another way! You can create another function inside `impl ParsePosNonzeroError` to use with `map_err()`. Read more about `map_err()` in the `std::result` documentation: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/result/enum.Result.html#method.map_err""" # Generics [[exercises]] name = "generics1" path = "exercises/14_generics/generics1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Vectors in Rust make use of generics to create dynamically sized arrays of any type. You need to tell the compiler what type we are pushing onto this vector.""" [[exercises]] name = "generics2" path = "exercises/14_generics/generics2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Currently we are wrapping only values of type `u32`. Maybe we could update the explicit references to this data type somehow? If you are still stuck https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch10-01-syntax.html#in-method-definitions """ # TRAITS [[exercises]] name = "traits1" path = "exercises/15_traits/traits1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ A discussion about Traits in Rust can be found at: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-02-traits.html """ [[exercises]] name = "traits2" path = "exercises/15_traits/traits2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Notice how the trait takes ownership of `self`, and returns `Self`. Try mutating the incoming string vector. Have a look at the tests to see what the result should look like! Vectors provide suitable methods for adding an element at the end. See the documentation at: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html""" [[exercises]] name = "traits3" path = "exercises/15_traits/traits3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Traits can have a default implementation for functions. Structs that implement the trait can then use the default version of these functions if they choose not to implement the function themselves. See the documentation at: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-02-traits.html#default-implementations """ [[exercises]] name = "traits4" path = "exercises/15_traits/traits4.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Instead of using concrete types as parameters you can use traits. Try replacing the '??' with 'impl ' See the documentation at: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-02-traits.html#traits-as-parameters """ [[exercises]] name = "traits5" path = "exercises/15_traits/traits5.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ To ensure a parameter implements multiple traits use the '+ syntax'. Try replacing the '??' with 'impl <> + <>'. See the documentation at: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-02-traits.html#specifying-multiple-trait-bounds-with-the--syntax """ # QUIZ 3 [[exercises]] name = "quiz3" path = "exercises/quiz3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ To find the best solution to this challenge you're going to need to think back to your knowledge of traits, specifically 'Trait Bound Syntax' You may also need this: `use std::fmt::Display;`.""" # LIFETIMES [[exercises]] name = "lifetimes1" path = "exercises/16_lifetimes/lifetimes1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Let the compiler guide you. Also take a look at the book if you need help: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-03-lifetime-syntax.html""" [[exercises]] name = "lifetimes2" path = "exercises/16_lifetimes/lifetimes2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Remember that the generic lifetime `'a` will get the concrete lifetime that is equal to the smaller of the lifetimes of `x` and `y`. You can take at least two paths to achieve the desired result while keeping the inner block: 1. Move the `string2` declaration to make it live as long as `string1` (how is `result` declared?) 2. Move `println!` into the inner block""" [[exercises]] name = "lifetimes3" path = "exercises/16_lifetimes/lifetimes3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ If you use a lifetime annotation in a struct's fields, where else does it need to be added?""" # TESTS [[exercises]] name = "tests1" path = "exercises/17_tests/tests1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ You don't even need to write any code to test -- you can just test values and run that, even though you wouldn't do that in real life. :) `assert!` is a macro that needs an argument. Depending on the value of the argument, `assert!` will do nothing (in which case the test will pass) or `assert!` will panic (in which case the test will fail). So try giving different values to `assert!` and see which ones compile, which ones pass, and which ones fail :)""" [[exercises]] name = "tests2" path = "exercises/17_tests/tests2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Like the previous exercise, you don't need to write any code to get this test to compile and run. `assert_eq!` is a macro that takes two arguments and compares them. Try giving it two values that are equal! Try giving it two arguments that are different! Try giving it two values that are of different types! Try switching which argument comes first and which comes second!""" [[exercises]] name = "tests3" path = "exercises/17_tests/tests3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ You can call a function right where you're passing arguments to `assert!`. So you could do something like `assert!(having_fun())`. If you want to check that you indeed get `false`, you can negate the result of what you're doing using `!`, like `assert!(!having_fun())`.""" [[exercises]] name = "tests4" path = "exercises/17_tests/tests4.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ We expect method `Rectangle::new()` to panic for negative values. To handle that you need to add a special attribute to the test function. You can refer to the docs: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch11-01-writing-tests.html#checking-for-panics-with-should_panic""" # STANDARD LIBRARY TYPES [[exercises]] name = "iterators1" path = "exercises/18_iterators/iterators1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Step 1: We need to apply something to the collection `my_fav_fruits` before we start to go through it. What could that be? Take a look at the struct definition for a vector for inspiration: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html Step 2 & step 3: Very similar to the lines above and below. You've got this! Step 4: An iterator goes through all elements in a collection, but what if we've run out of elements? What should we expect here? If you're stuck, take a look at https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html for some ideas. """ [[exercises]] name = "iterators2" path = "exercises/18_iterators/iterators2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Step 1: The variable `first` is a `char`. It needs to be capitalized and added to the remaining characters in `c` in order to return the correct `String`. The remaining characters in `c` can be viewed as a string slice using the `as_str` method. The documentation for `char` contains many useful methods. https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.char.html Step 2: Create an iterator from the slice. Transform the iterated values by applying the `capitalize_first` function. Remember to `collect` the iterator. Step 3: This is surprisingly similar to the previous solution. `collect` is very powerful and very general. Rust just needs to know the desired type.""" [[exercises]] name = "iterators3" path = "exercises/18_iterators/iterators3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ The `divide` function needs to return the correct error when even division is not possible. The `division_results` variable needs to be collected into a collection type. The `result_with_list` function needs to return a single `Result` where the success case is a vector of integers and the failure case is a `DivisionError`. The `list_of_results` function needs to return a vector of results. See https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html#method.collect for how the `FromIterator` trait is used in `collect()`. This trait is REALLY powerful! It can make the solution to this exercise infinitely easier.""" [[exercises]] name = "iterators4" path = "exercises/18_iterators/iterators4.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ In an imperative language, you might write a `for` loop that updates a mutable variable. Or, you might write code utilizing recursion and a match clause. In Rust you can take another functional approach, computing the factorial elegantly with ranges and iterators. Hint 2: Check out the `fold` and `rfold` methods!""" [[exercises]] name = "iterators5" path = "exercises/18_iterators/iterators5.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ The documentation for the `std::iter::Iterator` trait contains numerous methods that would be helpful here. The `collection` variable in `count_collection_iterator` is a slice of `HashMap`s. It needs to be converted into an iterator in order to use the iterator methods. The `fold` method can be useful in the `count_collection_iterator` function. For a further challenge, consult the documentation for `Iterator` to find a different method that could make your code more compact than using `fold`.""" # SMART POINTERS [[exercises]] name = "box1" path = "exercises/19_smart_pointers/box1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Step 1: The compiler's message should help: since we cannot store the value of the actual type when working with recursive types, we need to store a reference (pointer) to its value. We should, therefore, place our `List` inside a `Box`. More details in the book here: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch15-01-box.html#enabling-recursive-types-with-boxes Step 2: Creating an empty list should be fairly straightforward (hint: peek at the assertions). For a non-empty list keep in mind that we want to use our `Cons` "list builder". Although the current list is one of integers (`i32`), feel free to change the definition and try other types! """ [[exercises]] name = "rc1" path = "exercises/19_smart_pointers/rc1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ This is a straightforward exercise to use the `Rc` type. Each `Planet` has ownership of the `Sun`, and uses `Rc::clone()` to increment the reference count of the `Sun`. After using `drop()` to move the `Planet`s out of scope individually, the reference count goes down. In the end the `Sun` only has one reference again, to itself. See more at: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch15-04-rc.html * Unfortunately Pluto is no longer considered a planet :( """ [[exercises]] name = "arc1" path = "exercises/19_smart_pointers/arc1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Make `shared_numbers` be an `Arc` from the numbers vector. Then, in order to avoid creating a copy of `numbers`, you'll need to create `child_numbers` inside the loop but still in the main thread. `child_numbers` should be a clone of the `Arc` of the numbers instead of a thread-local copy of the numbers. This is a simple exercise if you understand the underlying concepts, but if this is too much of a struggle, consider reading through all of Chapter 16 in the book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch16-00-concurrency.html """ [[exercises]] name = "cow1" path = "exercises/19_smart_pointers/cow1.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ If `Cow` already owns the data it doesn't need to clone it when `to_mut()` is called. Check out https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/borrow/enum.Cow.html for documentation on the `Cow` type. """ # THREADS [[exercises]] name = "threads1" path = "exercises/20_threads/threads1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ `JoinHandle` is a struct that is returned from a spawned thread: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/thread/fn.spawn.html A challenge with multi-threaded applications is that the main thread can finish before the spawned threads are completed. https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch16-01-threads.html#waiting-for-all-threads-to-finish-using-join-handles Use the `JoinHandle`s to wait for each thread to finish and collect their results. https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/thread/struct.JoinHandle.html """ [[exercises]] name = "threads2" path = "exercises/20_threads/threads2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ `Arc` is an Atomic Reference Counted pointer that allows safe, shared access to **immutable** data. But we want to *change* the number of `jobs_completed` so we'll need to also use another type that will only allow one thread to mutate the data at a time. Take a look at this section of the book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch16-03-shared-state.html#atomic-reference-counting-with-arct Keep reading if you'd like more hints :) Do you now have an `Arc>` at the beginning of `main`? Like: ``` let status = Arc::new(Mutex::new(JobStatus { jobs_completed: 0 })); ``` Similar to the code in the following example in the book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch16-03-shared-state.html#sharing-a-mutext-between-multiple-threads """ [[exercises]] name = "threads3" path = "exercises/20_threads/threads3.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ An alternate way to handle concurrency between threads is to use an `mpsc` (multiple producer, single consumer) channel to communicate. With both a sending end and a receiving end, it's possible to send values in one thread and receive them in another. Multiple producers are possible by using clone() to create a duplicate of the original sending end. See https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch16-02-message-passing.html for more info. """ # MACROS [[exercises]] name = "macros1" path = "exercises/21_macros/macros1.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ When you call a macro, you need to add something special compared to a regular function call. If you're stuck, take a look at what's inside `my_macro`.""" [[exercises]] name = "macros2" path = "exercises/21_macros/macros2.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ Macros don't quite play by the same rules as the rest of Rust, in terms of what's available where. Unlike other things in Rust, the order of "where you define a macro" versus "where you use it" actually matters.""" [[exercises]] name = "macros3" path = "exercises/21_macros/macros3.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ In order to use a macro outside of its module, you need to do something special to the module to lift the macro out into its parent. The same trick also works on "extern crate" statements for crates that have exported macros, if you've seen any of those around.""" [[exercises]] name = "macros4" path = "exercises/21_macros/macros4.rs" mode = "compile" hint = """ You only need to add a single character to make this compile. The way macros are written, it wants to see something between each "macro arm", so it can separate them. That's all the macro exercises we have in here, but it's barely even scratching the surface of what you can do with Rust's macros. For a more thorough introduction, you can have a read through 'The Little Book of Rust Macros': https://veykril.github.io/tlborm/""" # CLIPPY [[exercises]] name = "clippy1" path = "exercises/22_clippy/clippy1.rs" mode = "clippy" hint = """ Rust stores the highest precision version of any long or infinite precision mathematical constants in the Rust standard library: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/f32/consts/index.html We may be tempted to use our own approximations for certain mathematical constants, but clippy recognizes those imprecise mathematical constants as a source of potential error. See the suggestions of the clippy warning in compile output and use the appropriate replacement constant from `std::f32::consts`...""" [[exercises]] name = "clippy2" path = "exercises/22_clippy/clippy2.rs" mode = "clippy" hint = """ `for` loops over `Option` values are more clearly expressed as an `if let`""" [[exercises]] name = "clippy3" path = "exercises/22_clippy/clippy3.rs" mode = "clippy" hint = "No hints this time!" # TYPE CONVERSIONS [[exercises]] name = "using_as" path = "exercises/23_conversions/using_as.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Use the `as` operator to cast one of the operands in the last line of the `average` function into the expected return type.""" [[exercises]] name = "from_into" path = "exercises/23_conversions/from_into.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Follow the steps provided right before the `From` implementation""" [[exercises]] name = "from_str" path = "exercises/23_conversions/from_str.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ The implementation of `FromStr` should return an `Ok` with a `Person` object, or an `Err` with an error if the string is not valid. This is almost like the `from_into` exercise, but returning errors instead of falling back to a default value. Look at the test cases to see which error variants to return. Another hint: You can use the `map_err` method of `Result` with a function or a closure to wrap the error from `parse::`. Yet another hint: If you would like to propagate errors by using the `?` operator in your solution, you might want to look at https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/reenter_question_mark.html """ [[exercises]] name = "try_from_into" path = "exercises/23_conversions/try_from_into.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Follow the steps provided right before the `TryFrom` implementation. You can also use the example at https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.TryFrom.html Is there an implementation of `TryFrom` in the standard library that can both do the required integer conversion and check the range of the input? Another hint: Look at the test cases to see which error variants to return. Yet another hint: You can use the `map_err` or `or` methods of `Result` to convert errors. Yet another hint: If you would like to propagate errors by using the `?` operator in your solution, you might want to look at https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/error/multiple_error_types/reenter_question_mark.html Challenge: Can you make the `TryFrom` implementations generic over many integer types?""" [[exercises]] name = "as_ref_mut" path = "exercises/23_conversions/as_ref_mut.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ Add `AsRef` or `AsMut` as a trait bound to the functions."""