Instead of having to explain why
```rs
let mut x = 100;
let y = &mut x;
let mut z_owned = *y;
let z = &mut z_owned;
*y += 100;
*z += 1000;
```
and
```rs
let mut x = 100;
let y = &mut x;
let z = &mut *y;
*y += 100;
*z += 1000;
```
are different, you still get the point across about having only one mutable reference.
As it stands, this exercise does too much (dereferencing and having only one mutable reference), and by doing so confuses people.
Example of someone being confused by this:
<https://discord.com/channels/273534239310479360/273541522815713281/872689531428692040>
Improve the hints for move_semantics5, as well as the explanatory
comments in the code.
Previously, it was not clear what possible changes were allowed.
It seems that reordering the statements might be the intended solution.
The previous comment about not "adding newlines" doesn't make sense,
so treating it as "adding new lines" makes it more clear.
mokou
Fredrik Enestad
frogtd
ana
Taylor Yu
Sateesh