Archives
/
rustlings
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1,819 Commits
2 Branches
49 Tags
31 MiB
main
gh-pages
rustlings-macros-v6.3.0
v6.3.0
rustlings-macros-v6.2.0
v6.2.0
rustlings-macros-v6.1.0
v6.1.0
rustlings-macros-v6.0.1
v6.0.1
rustlings-macros-v6.0.0
v6.0.0
1.0.0
1.0.1
1.1.0
1.1.1
1.2.0
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.3.0
1.4.0
1.4.1
1.5.0
1.5.1
2.0.0
2.1.0
2.2.0
2.2.1
3.0.0
4.0.0
4.1.0
4.2.0
4.3.0
4.4.0
4.5.0
4.6.0
4.7.0
4.7.1
4.8.0
5.0.0
5.1.0
5.1.1
5.2.0
5.2.1
5.3.0
5.4.0
5.4.1
5.5.0
5.5.1
5.6.0
5.6.1
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '10d8357876'
${ noResults }
Commit Graph

17 Commits (10d8357876fe1f6236b88ac652855acbfe126f5b)

Author SHA1 Message Date
liv 81cd97902a
Merge pull request #1487 from lionel-rowe/patch-1 
feat(options2): better test for layered_option
 1 year ago
Noah May 3ecb47ff2c fix(options3): panic when not matching to avoid false positives 
Closes #1503
 1 year ago
lionel-rowe 836134202e
feat(options2): better tests for layered_option 
The existing test can be solved with the following:

```rs
        while let Some(integer) = optional_integers.pop() {
            assert_eq!(integer.unwrap(), range);
```

Similarly with `expect(...)`, `unwrap_or(0)`, `unwrap_or_default()`, etc. However, none of these solutions use the learning point of stacking `Option<T>`s.

The updated test can _only_ be solved by stacking `Option<T>`s:

```rs
        while let Some(Some(integer)) = optional_integers.pop() {
            assert_eq!(integer, cursor);
```

With the updated test, using `unwrap` or `expect` will panic when it hits the `None` value, and using `unwrap_or` or `unwrap_or_default` will cause the final `assert_eq!(cursor, 0)`  to panic.
 1 year ago
Ali Afsharzadeh 382e16eb7e feat(docs): add markdown linter for exercises README.md files 2 years ago
liv f123cb2777
Merge pull request #1228 from grzegorz-zur/patch-1 
Removed unnecessary use statement
 2 years ago
TK Buristrakul a315f2fefb chore: added more descriptive TODOs 2 years ago
bhbuehler c157c53983 docs(options1): fix and clarify 24 hour time instruction 2 years ago
Grzegorz Żur da6178bdc6
Removed unnecessary use statement 2 years ago
magnusrodseth 99ea2cbba7 chore: make options2 not compile deliberately 2 years ago
magnusrodseth 52a29aa84b test: Convert main function to working tests 2 years ago
vostok92 4455c22b9a
Update options1.rs 
Fix assertions
 2 years ago
Nico Vromans e8122daa87
Update options1.rs 
Added extra test for before 10PM and updated the test for at 10PM (when it's 10PM there should already not be any ice cream left, as per the description). Also fixed the `raw_value` test, as it is later than 10PM, so there should be no more ice cream left.
 2 years ago
Markus Boehme 3c84cc1702 fix(options1): remove unused code 
Since rewriting the exercise in commit 06e4fd3765 the print_number
function goes unused. Remove it.
 2 years ago
Tristan Nicholls a56f648cce feat(options1): update expected result 
Expected result is updated to better showcase the difference between
- a valid result with no ice-creams `Some(0)`, and
- an invalid result `None`.
 2 years ago
mokou b71feed824 feat(options): add hint comments 2 years ago
mokou 06e4fd3765 feat(options1): rewrite to remove array stuff 2 years ago
mokou b644558c19 fix: rename option to options 2 years ago