diff --git a/exercises/collections/vec1.rs b/exercises/collections/vec1.rs index b144fb94..c26f5691 100644 --- a/exercises/collections/vec1.rs +++ b/exercises/collections/vec1.rs @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ // Your task is to create a `Vec` which holds the exact same elements // as in the array `a`. // Make me compile and pass the test! -// Execute the command `rustlings hint vec1` if you need hints. +// Execute `rustlings hint vec1` or use the `hint` watch subcommand for a hint. // I AM NOT DONE diff --git a/exercises/collections/vec2.rs b/exercises/collections/vec2.rs index 6595e401..db37d1d6 100644 --- a/exercises/collections/vec2.rs +++ b/exercises/collections/vec2.rs @@ -4,8 +4,7 @@ // // Make me pass the test! // -// Execute the command `rustlings hint vec2` if you need -// hints. +// Execute `rustlings hint vec2` or use the `hint` watch subcommand for a hint. // I AM NOT DONE @@ -13,12 +12,21 @@ fn vec_loop(mut v: Vec) -> Vec { for i in v.iter_mut() { // TODO: Fill this up so that each element in the Vec `v` is // multiplied by 2. + ??? } // At this point, `v` should be equal to [4, 8, 12, 16, 20]. v } +fn vec_map(v: &Vec) -> Vec { + v.iter().map(|num| { + // TODO: Do the same thing as above - but instead of mutating the + // Vec, you can just return the new number! + ??? + }).collect() +} + #[cfg(test)] mod tests { use super::*; @@ -30,4 +38,12 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(ans, v.iter().map(|x| x * 2).collect::>()); } + + #[test] + fn test_vec_map() { + let v: Vec = (1..).filter(|x| x % 2 == 0).take(5).collect(); + let ans = vec_map(&v); + + assert_eq!(ans, v.iter().map(|x| x * 2).collect::>()); + } } diff --git a/info.toml b/info.toml index 717ea95e..af4861c2 100644 --- a/info.toml +++ b/info.toml @@ -260,9 +260,15 @@ name = "vec2" path = "exercises/collections/vec2.rs" mode = "test" hint = """ -Hint 1: `i` is each element from the Vec as they are being iterated. - Can you try multiplying this? -Hint 2: Check the suggestion from the compiler error ;) +Hint 1: `i` is each element from the Vec as they are being iterated. Can you try +multiplying this? + +Hint 2: For the first function, there's a way to directly access the numbers stored +in the Vec, using the * dereference operator. You can both access and write to the +number that way. + +After you've completed both functions, decide for yourself which approach you like +better. What do you think is the more commonly used pattern under Rust developers? """ # MOVE SEMANTICS