From 3b8662e0dcd4a72467ba666bbbd728bb5b54b179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emanuel Czirai Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:57:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] long lines alignment, inside the .md --- patterns/builder.md | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/patterns/builder.md b/patterns/builder.md index 2c9b6df..31a71a0 100644 --- a/patterns/builder.md +++ b/patterns/builder.md @@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ single method with a given name, having multiple constructors is less nice in Rust than in C++, Java, or others. This pattern is often used where the builder object is useful in its own right, -rather than being just a builder. For example, see [`std::process::Command`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/process/struct.Command.html) is a -builder for [`Child`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/process/struct.Child.html) (a process). In these cases, the `T` and `TBuilder` pattern +rather than being just a builder. For example, see +[`std::process::Command`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/process/struct.Command.html) +is a builder for [`Child`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/process/struct.Child.html) +(a process). In these cases, the `T` and `TBuilder` pattern of naming is not used. The example takes and returns the builder by value. It is often more ergonomic