- not 100% sure about it
- but this kind of warning upfront might be useful
- it might help fight against hype and plain mis-information
- there are misinformed people out there who think this is a gold-mine like BTC mining in the early years
- think it over and decide if you want to pull it in or drop it
- "millionths per satoshi" ==> it is a rate, so it is just "millionths". Just like interest rate is 2% and not "2% per $" or "2%/$"
- rephrased and highlighted to make it more clear, more easy to follow
- changed 100,000 amount to 1,000,000 solely that at the end F_base and F_rate*P are different (different numbers make a better example)
- there was a BUG: in given example F_rate is 1 (not 100)
- "F_rate = 10/1,000,000 * payment size" ==> wrong: ==> F_rate = 10/1,000,000 is correct
- put ( ) around F_rate * P to make it extra clear
- \Rightarrow is NOT showing correctly in "Preview" window, not sure why, \Rightarrow is correct Latex but not shown correctly here. I did not touch it. Maybe this is handled by post-processing.
- somewhat -> too colloquial
- simplifications
- 'originally' as used in this sentence implies (or at least hints) that it no longer is. I don't think this is what you want to express. Maybe you wanted to express that lnd were the first. To avoid confusion, I removed "originally".
- restructuring of sentences
- typo clightning
- typo controll
- lose -> close
- BUG: you mixed up min and max parameters in autopilot config!
- BUG: I changed the text rather than the numbers to KEEP the parameter ORDER the SAME as in sample-lnd.conf file
- "not more" --> sort of double negation, better "less"
- don't mix cases: one, they --> rephrased to use singular in both cases
- chosen arbitrary -> must use adverb, --> arbitrarily
- "quite some funds" --> very vague. Rephrased to explain how to save fees
- usefull -> useful
- etc
- rephrasing
- typo: you --> your
- less-public: sounds strange, replaced
- simplifications
- comma
- it's wrong --> its (possessive)
- no comma in front of "because" (in most cases)
- after using "you" all the time, suddenly "we" is used. For consistency, changed it to "you"
- etc.
- comma (no comma when or is used between 2 items)
- comma (use comma after "by default, ")
- comma (use Oxford comma for consistency when there are 3+ items in "and" or "or)
- an SCB (with "n")
- rephrasing the argument for SCBs
- UPNP: the description in my opinion was incorrect, at least misleading. I rephrased to eliminate the part of the sentence that was doubtful in my opinion
- it's --> its (possessive)
- addition of checking TOR installation
