Grammar fix (#844)

3 years ago · 6064c6b6f3
parent 8f5ce3d52b
commit 6064c6b6f3
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
--- a/07_payment_channels.asciidoc
+++ b/07_payment_channels.asciidoc
@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ It is indeed! In fact, we rely on Bitcoin's ability to *prevent* a double spend

 As long as Alice and Bob hold these transactions and don't broadcast them, the funding output is unspent. But if a commitment transaction is broadcast and confirmed, it will spend the funding output. If Alice or Bob attempt to broadcast more than one commitment transaction, only one of them will be confirmed and the others will be rejected as attempted (and failed) double-spends.

-If more than one commitment transaction are broadcast, there are many factors that will determine which one gets confirmed first: the amount of fees included, the speed of propagation of these competing transactions, network topology, etc. Essentially it becomes a race without a predictable outcome. That doesn't sound very secure, it sounds like someone could cheat.
+If more than one commitment transaction are broadcast, there are many factors that will determine which one gets confirmed first: the amount of fees included, the speed of propagation of these competing transactions, network topology, etc. Essentially it becomes a race without a predictable outcome. That doesn't sound very secure. It sounds like someone could cheat.

 ==== Cheating with old commitment transactions