Comparison

README.md

@@ -290,6 +290,15 @@ We have an embarrassment of riches! There are three main choices I would recomme
 - http://try.purescript.org/
 - http://www.christopherbiscardi.com/2014/06/22/getting-started-with-purescript/ Great guide for getting started
 
+### Which do frontend language do I use?
+
+GHCJS and Haste are both fully Haskell. GHCJS will work with more Haskell packages than Haste, but this doesn't affect a lot of frontend projects. PureScript isn't Haskell at all, so direct code sharing with your backend will not work.
+
+GHCJS has the fattest runtime payload overhead at about 100kb (luite is working on this). Haste and PureScript are competitive.
+
+PureScript has the best JS tooling integration (uses gulp/grunt/bower), GHCJS and Haste integrate better with Haskell's tooling (Cabal).
+
+All three are great choices and will work for most frontend projects.
 
 ## Parsing in Haskell