mirror of
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain
synced 2024-11-11 19:11:02 +00:00
a50eabbd48
- Description: Modified the prompt created by the function
`create_unstructured_prompt` (which is called for LLMs that do not
support function calling) by adding conditional checks that verify if
restrictions on entity types and rel_types should be added to the
prompt. If the user provides a sufficiently large text, the current
prompt **may** fail to produce results in some LLMs. I have first seen
this issue when I implemented a custom LLM class that did not support
Function Calling and used Gemini 1.5 Pro, but I was able to replicate
this issue using OpenAI models.
By loading a sufficiently large text
```python
from langchain_community.llms import Ollama
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI, OpenAI
from langchain_core.prompts import PromptTemplate
import re
from langchain_experimental.graph_transformers import LLMGraphTransformer
from langchain_core.documents import Document
with open("texto-longo.txt", "r") as file:
full_text = file.read()
partial_text = full_text[:4000]
documents = [Document(page_content=partial_text)] # cropped to fit GPT 3.5 context window
```
And using the chat class (that has function calling)
```python
chat_openai = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-3.5-turbo", model_kwargs={"seed": 42})
chat_gpt35_transformer = LLMGraphTransformer(llm=chat_openai)
graph_from_chat_gpt35 = chat_gpt35_transformer.convert_to_graph_documents(documents)
```
It works:
```
>>> print(graph_from_chat_gpt35[0].nodes)
[Node(id="Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring", type='Music'), Node(id='Godel', type='Person'), Node(id='Johann Sebastian Bach', type='Person'), Node(id='clever way of encoding the complicated expressions as numbers', type='Concept')]
```
But if you try to use the non-chat LLM class (that does not support
function calling)
```python
openai = OpenAI(
model="gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct",
max_tokens=1000,
)
gpt35_transformer = LLMGraphTransformer(llm=openai)
graph_from_gpt35 = gpt35_transformer.convert_to_graph_documents(documents)
```
It uses the prompt that has issues and sometimes does not produce any
result
```
>>> print(graph_from_gpt35[0].nodes)
[]
```
After implementing the changes, I was able to use both classes more
consistently:
```shell
>>> chat_gpt35_transformer = LLMGraphTransformer(llm=chat_openai)
>>> graph_from_chat_gpt35 = chat_gpt35_transformer.convert_to_graph_documents(documents)
>>> print(graph_from_chat_gpt35[0].nodes)
[Node(id="Jesu, Joy Of Man'S Desiring", type='Music'), Node(id='Johann Sebastian Bach', type='Person'), Node(id='Godel', type='Person')]
>>> gpt35_transformer = LLMGraphTransformer(llm=openai)
>>> graph_from_gpt35 = gpt35_transformer.convert_to_graph_documents(documents)
>>> print(graph_from_gpt35[0].nodes)
[Node(id='I', type='Pronoun'), Node(id="JESU, JOY OF MAN'S DESIRING", type='Song'), Node(id='larger memory', type='Memory'), Node(id='this nice tree structure', type='Structure'), Node(id='how you can do it all with the numbers', type='Process'), Node(id='JOHANN SEBASTIAN BACH', type='Composer'), Node(id='type of structure', type='Characteristic'), Node(id='that', type='Pronoun'), Node(id='we', type='Pronoun'), Node(id='worry', type='Verb')]
```
The results are a little inconsistent because the GPT 3.5 model may
produce incomplete json due to the token limit, but that could be solved
(or mitigated) by checking for a complete json when parsing it.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| diffbot.py | ||
| llm.py | ||