PyPI trusted publishing wants to know which workflow is expected to do
the publish. We always want to publish from the same workflow, so we're
making `_test_release.yml` the only workflow that publishes to Test
PyPI.
This follows the principle of least privilege. Our `poetry build` step
doesn't need, and shouldn't get, access to our GitHub OIDC capability.
This is the same structure as I used in the already-merged PR for
refactoring the regular PyPI release workflow: #12578.
Best to review one commit at a time, since two of the commits are 100%
autogenerated changes from running `ruff format`:
- Install and use `ruff format` instead of black for code formatting.
- Output of `ruff format .` in the `langchain` package.
- Use `ruff format` in experimental package.
- Format changes in experimental package by `ruff format`.
- Manual formatting fixes to make `ruff .` pass.
Before making a new `langchain` release, we want to test that everything
works as expected. This PR lets us publish `langchain` to test PyPI,
then install it from there and run checks to ensure everything works
normally before publishing it "for real".
It also takes the opportunity to refactor the build process, splitting
up the build, release-creation, and PyPI upload steps into separate jobs
that do not share their elevated permissions with each other.
Adds a `langchain-location` param to lint, so we can properly locate it.
Regular langchain and experimental lint steps are passing, so default
value seems to be working.
Will run all CI because of _test change, but future PRs against CLI will
only trigger the new CLI one
Has a bunch of file changes related to formatting/linting.
No mypy yet - coming soon
code of conduct.md file is missing it is generally present in good repos
which have large community
Replace this entire comment with:
- **Description:** Added a `code_of_conduct.md` file to the repository
to establish community standards and guidelines for contributors.
- **Issue:** N/A
- **Dependencies:** N/A
- **Tag maintainer:** N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
We don't use any of the new functionality at the moment. Just making
sure we don't fall back on versions and fail to benefit from new
patches. This is an easy upgrade and it's always harder to upgrade
across multiple major versions at once.
Adding description of the `View deployment` button on the PR page. This
nice feature was not documented.
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erickfriis@gmail.com>
<!-- Thank you for contributing to LangChain!
Replace this entire comment with:
- **Description:** a description of the change,
- **Issue:** the issue # it fixes (if applicable),
- **Dependencies:** any dependencies required for this change,
- **Tag maintainer:** for a quicker response, tag the relevant
maintainer (see below),
- **Twitter handle:** we announce bigger features on Twitter. If your PR
gets announced, and you'd like a mention, we'll gladly shout you out!
Please make sure your PR is passing linting and testing before
submitting. Run `make format`, `make lint` and `make test` to check this
locally.
See contribution guidelines for more information on how to write/run
tests, lint, etc:
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
If you're adding a new integration, please include:
1. a test for the integration, preferably unit tests that do not rely on
network access,
2. an example notebook showing its use. It lives in `docs/extras`
directory.
If no one reviews your PR within a few days, please @-mention one of
@baskaryan, @eyurtsev, @hwchase17.
-->
### Description
renamed several repository links from `hwchase17` to `langchain-ai`.
### Why
I discovered that the README file in the devcontainer contains an old
repository name, so I took the opportunity to rename the old repository
name in all files within the repository, excluding those that do not
require changes.
### Dependencies
none
### Tag maintainer
@baskaryan
### Twitter handle
[kzk_maeda](https://twitter.com/kzk_maeda)
Adds LangServe package
* Integrate Runnables with Fast API creating Server and a RemoteRunnable
client
* Support multiple runnables for a given server
* Support sync/async/batch/abatch/stream/astream/astream_log on the
client side (using async implementations on server)
* Adds validation using annotations (relying on pydantic under the hood)
-- this still has some rough edges -- e.g., open api docs do NOT
generate correctly at the moment
* Uses pydantic v1 namespace
Known issues: type translation code doesn't handle a lot of types (e.g.,
TypedDicts)
---------
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <22008038+baskaryan@users.noreply.github.com>
