**langchain: ConversationVectorStoreTokenBufferMemory**
-**Description:** This PR adds ConversationVectorStoreTokenBufferMemory.
It is similar in concept to ConversationSummaryBufferMemory. It
maintains an in-memory buffer of messages up to a preset token limit.
After the limit is hit timestamped messages are written into a
vectorstore retriever rather than into a summary. The user's prompt is
then used to retrieve relevant fragments of the previous conversation.
By persisting the vectorstore, one can maintain memory from session to
session.
-**Issue:** n/a
-**Dependencies:** none
-**Twitter handle:** Please no!!!
- [X] **Add tests and docs**: I looked to see how the unit tests were
written for the other ConversationMemory modules, but couldn't find
anything other than a test for successful import. I need to know whether
you are using pytest.mock or another fixture to simulate the LLM and
vectorstore. In addition, I would like guidance on where to place the
documentation. Should it be a notebook file in docs/docs?
- [X] **Lint and test**: I am seeing some linting errors from a couple
of modules unrelated to this PR.
If no one reviews your PR within a few days, please @-mention one of
baskaryan, efriis, eyurtsev, ccurme, vbarda, hwchase17.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lincoln Stein <lstein@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: isaac hershenson <ihershenson@hmc.edu>
0.2 is not a breaking release for core (but it is for langchain and
community)
To keep the core+langchain+community packages in sync at 0.2, we will
relax deps throughout the ecosystem to tolerate `langchain-core` 0.2
## Summary
This PR upgrades LangChain's Ruff configuration in preparation for
Ruff's v0.2.0 release. (The changes are compatible with Ruff v0.1.5,
which LangChain uses today.) Specifically, we're now warning when
linter-only options are specified under `[tool.ruff]` instead of
`[tool.ruff.lint]`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
