* Removed `ruff check --select I` as `I` is already selected and checked
in the main `ruff check` command
* Added checks for non-empty `PYTHON_FILES`
* Run `ruff check` only on `PYTHON_FILES`
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Here we allow standard tests to specify a value for `tool_choice` via a
`tool_choice_value` property, which defaults to None.
Chat models [available in
Together](https://docs.together.ai/docs/chat-models) have issues passing
standard tool calling tests:
- llama 3.1 models currently [appear to rely on user-side
parsing](https://docs.together.ai/docs/llama-3-function-calling) in
Together;
- Mixtral-8x7B and Mistral-7B (currently tested) consistently do not
call tools in some tests.
Specifying tool_choice also lets us remove an existing `xfail` and use a
smaller model in Groq tests.
Among integration packages in libs/partners, Groq is an exception in
that it errors on warnings.
Following https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/25084, Groq
fails with
> pydantic.warnings.PydanticDeprecatedSince20: The `__fields__`
attribute is deprecated, use `model_fields` instead. Deprecated in
Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0.
Here we update the behavior to no longer fail on warning, which is
consistent with the rest of the packages in libs/partners.
supports following UX
```python
class SubTool(TypedDict):
"""Subtool docstring"""
args: Annotated[Dict[str, Any], {}, "this does bar"]
class Tool(TypedDict):
"""Docstring
Args:
arg1: foo
"""
arg1: str
arg2: Union[int, str]
arg3: Optional[List[SubTool]]
arg4: Annotated[Literal["bar", "baz"], ..., "this does foo"]
arg5: Annotated[Optional[float], None]
```
- can parse google style docstring
- can use Annotated to specify default value (second arg)
- can use Annotated to specify arg description (third arg)
- can have nested complex types
- Mixtral with Groq has started consistently failing tool calling tests.
Here we restrict testing to llama 3.1.
- `.schema` is deprecated in pydantic proper in favor of
`.model_json_schema`.
resolves https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/23911
When an AIMessageChunk is instantiated, we attempt to parse tool calls
off of the tool_call_chunks.
Here we add a special-case to this parsing, where `""` will be parsed as
`{}`.
This is a reaction to how Anthropic streams tool calls in the case where
a function has no arguments:
```
{'id': 'toolu_01J8CgKcuUVrMqfTQWPYh64r', 'input': {}, 'name': 'magic_function', 'type': 'tool_use', 'index': 1}
{'partial_json': '', 'type': 'tool_use', 'index': 1}
```
The `partial_json` does not accumulate to a valid json string-- most
other providers tend to emit `"{}"` in this case.
- add test for structured output
- fix bug with structured output for Azure
- better testing on Groq (break out Mixtral + Llama3 and add xfails
where needed)
Currently, calling `with_structured_output()` with an invalid method
argument raises `Unrecognized method argument. Expected one of
'function_calling' or 'json_format'`, but the JSON mode option [is now
referred
to](https://python.langchain.com/v0.2/docs/how_to/structured_output/#the-with_structured_output-method)
by `'json_mode'`. This fixes that.
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
- Refactor standard test classes to make them easier to configure
- Update openai to support stop_sequences init param
- Update groq to support stop_sequences init param
- Update fireworks to support max_retries init param
- Update ChatModel.bind_tools to type tool_choice
- Update groq to handle tool_choice="any". **this may be controversial**
---------
Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
Updated ChatGroq doc string as per issue
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/22296:"langchain_groq:
updated docstring for ChatGroq in langchain_groq to match that of the
description (in the appendix) provided in issue
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/22296. "
Issue: This PR is in response to issue
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/22296, and more
specifically the ChatGroq model. In particular, this PR updates the
docstring for langchain/libs/partners/groq/langchain_groq/chat_model.py
by adding the following sections: Instantiate, Invoke, Stream, Async,
Tool calling, Structured Output, and Response metadata. I used the
template from the Anthropic implementation and referenced the Appendix
of the original issue post. I also noted that: `usage_metadata `returns
none for all ChatGroq models I tested; there is no mention of image
input in the ChatGroq documentation; unlike that of ChatHuggingFace,
`.stream(messages)` for ChatGroq returned blocks of output.
---------
Co-authored-by: lucast2021 <lucast2021@headroyce.org>
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
```python
class UsageMetadata(TypedDict):
"""Usage metadata for a message, such as token counts.
Attributes:
input_tokens: (int) count of input (or prompt) tokens
output_tokens: (int) count of output (or completion) tokens
total_tokens: (int) total token count
"""
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
total_tokens: int
```
```python
class AIMessage(BaseMessage):
...
usage_metadata: Optional[UsageMetadata] = None
"""If provided, token usage information associated with the message."""
...
```
0.2 is not a breaking release for core (but it is for langchain and
community)
To keep the core+langchain+community packages in sync at 0.2, we will
relax deps throughout the ecosystem to tolerate `langchain-core` 0.2
## Summary
No new diagnostics (given that the set of enabled rules hasn't changed),
but gains access to our new parser (much faster) and reduced false
positives all around.
# Proxy Fix for Groq Class 🐛🚀
## Description
This PR fixes a bug related to proxy settings in the `Groq` class,
allowing users to connect to LangChain services via a proxy.
## Changes Made
- ✅ FIX support for specifying proxy settings in the `Groq` class.
- ✅ Resolved the bug causing issues with proxy settings.
- ❌ Did not include unit tests and documentation updates.
- ❌ Did not run make format, make lint, and make test to ensure code
quality and functionality because I couldn't get it to run, so I don't
program in Python and couldn't run `ruff`.
- ❔ Ensured that the changes are backwards compatible.
- ✅ No additional dependencies were added to `pyproject.toml`.
### Error Before Fix
```python
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/bg/Documents/code/github.com/back2nix/test/groq/main.py", line 9, in <module>
chat = ChatGroq(
^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/bg/Documents/code/github.com/back2nix/test/groq/venv310/lib/python3.11/site-packages/langchain_core/load/serializable.py", line 120, in __init__
super().__init__(**kwargs)
File "/home/bg/Documents/code/github.com/back2nix/test/groq/venv310/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/v1/main.py", line 341, in __init__
raise validation_error
pydantic.v1.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for ChatGroq
__root__
Invalid `http_client` argument; Expected an instance of `httpx.AsyncClient` but got <class 'httpx.Client'> (type=type_error)
```
### Example usage after fix
```python3
import os
import httpx
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from langchain_groq import ChatGroq
chat = ChatGroq(
temperature=0,
groq_api_key=os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY"),
model_name="mixtral-8x7b-32768",
http_client=httpx.Client(
proxies="socks5://127.0.0.1:1080",
transport=httpx.HTTPTransport(local_address="0.0.0.0"),
),
http_async_client=httpx.AsyncClient(
proxies="socks5://127.0.0.1:1080",
transport=httpx.HTTPTransport(local_address="0.0.0.0"),
),
)
system = "You are a helpful assistant."
human = "{text}"
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages([("system", system), ("human", human)])
chain = prompt | chat
out = chain.invoke({"text": "Explain the importance of low latency LLMs"})
print(out)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <22008038+baskaryan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
```python
from langchain.agents import AgentExecutor, create_tool_calling_agent, tool
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate, MessagesPlaceholder
from langchain_groq import ChatGroq
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages(
[
("system", "You are a helpful assistant"),
("human", "{input}"),
MessagesPlaceholder("agent_scratchpad"),
]
)
model = ChatGroq(model_name="mixtral-8x7b-32768", temperature=0)
@tool
def magic_function(input: int) -> int:
"""Applies a magic function to an input."""
return input + 2
tools = [magic_function]
agent = create_tool_calling_agent(model, tools, prompt)
agent_executor = AgentExecutor(agent=agent, tools=tools, verbose=True)
agent_executor.invoke({"input": "what is the value of magic_function(3)?"})
```
```
> Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Invoking: `magic_function` with `{'input': 3}`
5The value of magic\_function(3) is 5.
> Finished chain.
{'input': 'what is the value of magic_function(3)?',
'output': 'The value of magic\\_function(3) is 5.'}
```
