Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Predrag Gruevski
95a1b598fe
Update to actions/checkout@v4. (#11951)
We don't use any of the new functionality at the moment. Just making
sure we don't fall back on versions and fail to benefit from new
patches. This is an easy upgrade and it's always harder to upgrade
across multiple major versions at once.
2023-10-23 10:01:33 -04:00
Predrag Gruevski
d21dd72d64
Upgrade CI workflows to poetry 1.6.1. (#11344) 2023-10-03 19:23:54 -04:00
Predrag Gruevski
9aaa0fdce0 Use unified Python setup steps for release workflow. 2023-08-28 14:20:48 +00:00
Predrag Gruevski
a1e89aa8d5
Explicitly add the contents: write permission for publishing releases. (#9617) 2023-08-22 08:38:18 -07:00
Predrag Gruevski
9f08d29bc8
Use PyPI Trusted Publishing to publish langchain packages. (#9467)
Trusted Publishing is the current best practice for publishing Python
packages. Rather than long-lived secret keys, it uses OpenID Connect
(OIDC) to allow our GitHub runner to directly authenticate itself to
PyPI and get a short-lived publishing token. This locks down publishing
quite a bit:
- There's no long-lived publish key to steal anymore.
- Publishing is *only* allowed via the *specifically designated* GitHub
workflow in the designated repo.

It also is operationally easier: no keys means there's nothing that
needs to be periodically rotated, nothing to worry about leaking, and
nobody can accidentally publish a release from their laptop because they
happened to have PyPI keys set up.

After this gets merged, we'll need to configure PyPI to start expecting
trusted publishing. It's only a few clicks and should only take a
minute; instructions are here:
https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers/adding-a-publisher/

More info:
- https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2023-04-20-introducing-trusted-publishers/
- https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish
2023-08-21 14:44:29 -04:00
Predrag Gruevski
a7eba8b006
Release on push to master instead of on closed PRs targeting it. (#9544)
This is safer than the prior approach, since it's safe by default: the
release workflows never get triggered for non-merged PRs, so there's no
possibility of a buggy conditional accidentally letting a workflow
proceed when it shouldn't have.

The only loss is that publishing no longer requires a `release` label on
the merged PR that bumps the version. We can add a separate CI step that
enforces that part as a condition for merging into `master`, if
desirable.
2023-08-21 12:57:40 -04:00
Predrag Gruevski
a03003f5fd
Upgrade CI poetry version to 1.5.1. (#9479)
Poetry v1.5.1 was released on May 29, almost 3 months ago. Probably a
safe upgrade.
2023-08-21 10:35:56 -04:00
Yuki Miyake
85a1c6d0b7
🐛 fix unexpected run of release workflow (#9494)
I have discovered a bug located within `.github/workflows/_release.yml`
which is the primary cause of continuous integration (CI) errors. The
problem can be solved; therefore, I have constructed a PR to address the
issue.

## The Issue

Access the following link to view the exact errors: [Langhain Release
Workflow](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/actions/workflows/langchain_release.yml)

The instances of these errors take place for **each PR** that updates
`pyproject.toml`, excluding those specifically associated with bumping
PRs.

See below for the specific error message:

```
Error: Error 422: Validation Failed: {"resource":"Release","code":"already_exists","field":"tag_name"}
```

An image of the error can be viewed here:

![Image](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/assets/13769670/13125f73-9b53-49b7-a83e-653bb01a1da1)

The `_release.yml` document contains the following if-condition:

```yaml
    if: |
        ${{ github.event.pull_request.merged == true }}
        && ${{ contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'release') }}
```

## The Root Cause

The above job constantly runs as the `if-condition` is always identified
as `true`.

## The Logic

The `if-condition` can be defined as `if: ${{ b1 }} && ${{ b2 }}`, where
`b1` and `b2` are boolean values. However, in terms of condition
evaluation with GitHub Actions, `${{ false }}` is identified as a string
value, thereby rendering it as truthy as per the [official
documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idif).

I have run some tests regarding this behavior within my forked
repository. You can consult my [debug
PR](https://github.com/zawakin/langchain/pull/1) for reference.

Here is the result of the tests:

|If-Condition|Outcome|
|:--:|:--:|
|`if: true && ${{ false }}`|Execution|
|`if: ${{ false }}` |Skipped|
|`if: true && false` |Skipped|
|`if: false`|Skipped|
|`if: ${{ true && false }}` |Skipped|

In view of the first and second results, we can infer that `${{ false
}}` can only be interpreted as `true` for conditions composed of some
expressions.
It is consistent that the condition of `if: ${{ inputs.working-directory
== 'libs/langchain' }}` works.

It is surprised to be skipped for the second case but it seems the spec
of GitHub Actions 😓

Anyway, the PR would fix these errors, I believe 👍 

Could you review this? @hwchase17 or @shoelsch , who is the author of
[PR](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/360).
2023-08-21 10:34:03 -04:00
Harrison Chase
2448043b84
bump and fix (#8441) 2023-07-28 17:16:51 -07:00
Harrison Chase
cddd8ae83d
update release yml (#8364)
only do the step that tags and adds release notes if its langchain
2023-07-27 16:49:04 -07:00
Harrison Chase
f35db9f43e
(WIP) set up experimental (#7959) 2023-07-21 09:20:24 -07:00