2 Commits (a3598193a099f2b6d561e01b0dd16dcf24caac48)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Leonid Ganeline	443ebe22f4	docs: `Deployments` page moved into `Ecosystem/` (#4949) ... # docs: `deployments` page moved into `ecosystem/` The `Deployments` page moved into the `Ecosystem/` group Small fixes: - `index` page: fixed order of items in the `Modules` list, in the `Use Cases` list - item `References/Installation` was lost in the `index` page (not on the Navbar!). Restored it. - added `|` marker in several places. NOTE: I also thought about moving the `Additional Resources/Gallery` page into the `Ecosystem` group but decided to leave it unchanged. Please, advise on this. ## Who can review? Community members can review the PR once tests pass. Tag maintainers/contributors who might be interested: @dev2049	1 year ago
Leonid Ganeline	e2d7677526	docs: compound ecosystem and integrations (#4870) ... # Docs: compound ecosystem and integrations **Problem statement:** We have a big overlap between the References/Integrations and Ecosystem/LongChain Ecosystem pages. It confuses users. It creates a situation when new integration is added only on one of these pages, which creates even more confusion. - removed References/Integrations page (but move all its information into the individual integration pages - in the next PR). - renamed Ecosystem/LongChain Ecosystem into Integrations/Integrations. I like the Ecosystem term. It is more generic and semantically richer than the Integration term. But it mentally overloads users. The `integration` term is more concrete. UPDATE: after discussion, the Ecosystem is the term. Ecosystem/Integrations is the page (in place of Ecosystem/LongChain Ecosystem). As a result, a user gets a single place to start with the individual integration.	1 year ago