# Beam
Calls the Beam API wrapper to deploy and make subsequent calls to an
instance of the gpt2 LLM in a cloud deployment. Requires installation of
the Beam library and registration of Beam Client ID and Client Secret.
Additional calls can then be made through the instance of the large
language model in your code or by calling the Beam API.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dev 2049 <dev.dev2049@gmail.com>
# Vectara Integration
This PR provides integration with Vectara. Implemented here are:
* langchain/vectorstore/vectara.py
* tests/integration_tests/vectorstores/test_vectara.py
* langchain/retrievers/vectara_retriever.py
And two IPYNB notebooks to do more testing:
* docs/modules/chains/index_examples/vectara_text_generation.ipynb
* docs/modules/indexes/vectorstores/examples/vectara.ipynb
---------
Co-authored-by: Dev 2049 <dev.dev2049@gmail.com>
# Add a WhyLabs callback handler
* Adds a simple WhyLabsCallbackHandler
* Add required dependencies as optional
* protect against missing modules with imports
* Add docs/ecosystem basic example
based on initial prototype from @andrewelizondo
> this integration gathers privacy preserving telemetry on text with
whylogs and sends stastical profiles to WhyLabs platform to monitoring
these metrics over time. For more information on what WhyLabs is see:
https://whylabs.ai
After you run the notebook (if you have env variables set for the API
Keys, org_id and dataset_id) you get something like this in WhyLabs:
Co-authored-by: Andre Elizondo <andre@whylabs.ai>
Co-authored-by: Dev 2049 <dev.dev2049@gmail.com>
# Add documentation for Databricks integration
This is a follow-up of https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/pull/4702
It documents the details of how to integrate Databricks using langchain.
It also provides examples in a notebook.
## Who can review?
@dev2049 @hwchase17 since you are aware of the context. We will promote
the integration after this doc is ready. Thanks in advance!
# Docs: compound ecosystem and integrations
**Problem statement:** We have a big overlap between the
References/Integrations and Ecosystem/LongChain Ecosystem pages. It
confuses users. It creates a situation when new integration is added
only on one of these pages, which creates even more confusion.
- removed References/Integrations page (but move all its information
into the individual integration pages - in the next PR).
- renamed Ecosystem/LongChain Ecosystem into Integrations/Integrations.
I like the Ecosystem term. It is more generic and semantically richer
than the Integration term. But it mentally overloads users. The
`integration` term is more concrete.
UPDATE: after discussion, the Ecosystem is the term.
Ecosystem/Integrations is the page (in place of Ecosystem/LongChain
Ecosystem).
As a result, a user gets a single place to start with the individual
integration.
