nitpicking but just thought i'd add this typo which I found when going
through the How-to 😄 (unless it was intentional) also, it's amazing that
you added ReAct to LangChain!
Follow-up of @hinthornw's PR:
- Migrate the Tool abstraction to a separate file (`BaseTool`).
- `Tool` implementation of `BaseTool` takes in function and coroutine to
more easily maintain backwards compatibility
- Add a Toolkit abstraction that can own the generation of tools around
a shared concept or state
---------
Co-authored-by: William FH <13333726+hinthornw@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Ingham <fpingham@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Anand <105786647+dhruv-anand-aintech@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cragwolfe <cragcw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anton Troynikov <atroyn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Klingefjord <oliver@klingefjord.com>
Co-authored-by: William Fu-Hinthorn <whinthorn@Williams-MBP-3.attlocal.net>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Bornsztein <bruno.bornsztein@gmail.com>
This is a work in progress PR to track my progres.
## TODO:
- [x] Get results using the specifed searx host
- [x] Prioritize returning an `answer` or results otherwise
- [ ] expose the field `infobox` when available
- [ ] expose `score` of result to help agent's decision
- [ ] expose the `suggestions` field to agents so they could try new
queries if no results are found with the orignial query ?
- [ ] Dynamic tool description for agents ?
- Searx offers many engines and a search syntax that agents can take
advantage of. It would be nice to generate a dynamic Tool description so
that it can be used many times as a tool but for different purposes.
- [x] Limit number of results
- [ ] Implement paging
- [x] Miror the usage of the Google Search tool
- [x] easy selection of search engines
- [x] Documentation
- [ ] update HowTo guide notebook on Search Tools
- [ ] Handle async
- [ ] Tests
### Add examples / documentation on possible uses with
- [ ] getting factual answers with `!wiki` option and `infoboxes`
- [ ] getting `suggestions`
- [ ] getting `corrections`
---------
Co-authored-by: blob42 <spike@w530>
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
Adds Google Search integration with [Serper](https://serper.dev) a
low-cost alternative to SerpAPI (10x cheaper + generous free tier).
Includes documentation, tests and examples. Hopefully I am not missing
anything.
Developers can sign up for a free account at
[serper.dev](https://serper.dev) and obtain an api key.
## Usage
```python
from langchain.utilities import GoogleSerperAPIWrapper
from langchain.llms.openai import OpenAI
from langchain.agents import initialize_agent, Tool
import os
os.environ["SERPER_API_KEY"] = ""
os.environ['OPENAI_API_KEY'] = ""
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0)
search = GoogleSerperAPIWrapper()
tools = [
Tool(
name="Intermediate Answer",
func=search.run
)
]
self_ask_with_search = initialize_agent(tools, llm, agent="self-ask-with-search", verbose=True)
self_ask_with_search.run("What is the hometown of the reigning men's U.S. Open champion?")
```
### Output
```
Entering new AgentExecutor chain...
Yes.
Follow up: Who is the reigning men's U.S. Open champion?
Intermediate answer: Current champions Carlos Alcaraz, 2022 men's singles champion.
Follow up: Where is Carlos Alcaraz from?
Intermediate answer: El Palmar, Spain
So the final answer is: El Palmar, Spain
> Finished chain.
'El Palmar, Spain'
```
Supporting asyncio in langchain primitives allows for users to run them
concurrently and creates more seamless integration with
asyncio-supported frameworks (FastAPI, etc.)
Summary of changes:
**LLM**
* Add `agenerate` and `_agenerate`
* Implement in OpenAI by leveraging `client.Completions.acreate`
**Chain**
* Add `arun`, `acall`, `_acall`
* Implement them in `LLMChain` and `LLMMathChain` for now
**Agent**
* Refactor and leverage async chain and llm methods
* Add ability for `Tools` to contain async coroutine
* Implement async SerpaPI `arun`
Create demo notebook.
Open questions:
* Should all the async stuff go in separate classes? I've seen both
patterns (keeping the same class and having async and sync methods vs.
having class separation)
It's generally considered to be a good practice to pin dependencies to
prevent surprise breakages when a new version of a dependency is
released. This commit adds the ability to pin dependencies when loading
from LangChainHub.
Centralizing this logic and using urllib fixes an issue identified by
some windows users highlighted in this video -
https://youtu.be/aJ6IQUh8MLQ?t=537
- Add support for local build and linkchecking of docs
- Add GitHub Action to automatically check links before prior to
publication
- Minor reformat of Contributing readme
- Fix existing broken links
Co-authored-by: Hunter Gerlach <hunter@huntergerlach.com>
Co-authored-by: Hunter Gerlach <HunterGerlach@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hunter Gerlach <hunter@huntergerlach.com>
Big docs refactor! Motivation is to make it easier for people to find
resources they are looking for. To accomplish this, there are now three
main sections:
- Getting Started: steps for getting started, walking through most core
functionality
- Modules: these are different modules of functionality that langchain
provides. Each part here has a "getting started", "how to", "key
concepts" and "reference" section (except in a few select cases where it
didnt easily fit).
- Use Cases: this is to separate use cases (like summarization, question
answering, evaluation, etc) from the modules, and provide a different
entry point to the code base.
There is also a full reference section, as well as extra resources
(glossary, gallery, etc)
Co-authored-by: Shreya Rajpal <ShreyaR@users.noreply.github.com>
