<!-- Thank you for contributing to LangChain!
Replace this entire comment with:
- **Description:** a description of the change,
- **Issue:** the issue # it fixes (if applicable),
- **Dependencies:** any dependencies required for this change,
- **Tag maintainer:** for a quicker response, tag the relevant
maintainer (see below),
- **Twitter handle:** we announce bigger features on Twitter. If your PR
gets announced, and you'd like a mention, we'll gladly shout you out!
Please make sure your PR is passing linting and testing before
submitting. Run `make format`, `make lint` and `make test` to check this
locally.
See contribution guidelines for more information on how to write/run
tests, lint, etc:
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
If you're adding a new integration, please include:
1. a test for the integration, preferably unit tests that do not rely on
network access,
2. an example notebook showing its use. It lives in `docs/extras`
directory.
If no one reviews your PR within a few days, please @-mention one of
@baskaryan, @eyurtsev, @hwchase17.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
Builds out a developer documentation section in the docs
- Links it from contributing.md
- Adds an initial guide on how to contribute an integration
---------
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
… (#14723)
- **Description:** Minor updates per marketing requests. Namely, name
decisions (AI Foundation Models / AI Playground)
- **Tag maintainer:** @hinthornw
Do want to pass around the PR for a bit and ask a few more marketing
questions before merge, but just want to make sure I'm not working in a
vacuum. No major changes to code functionality intended; the PR should
be for documentation and only minor tweaks.
Note: QA model is a bit borked across staging/prod right now. Relevant
teams have been informed and are looking into it, and I'm placeholdered
the response to that of a working version in the notebook.
Co-authored-by: Vadim Kudlay <32310964+VKudlay@users.noreply.github.com>
Add a new ChatGoogleGenerativeAI class in a `langchain-google-genai`
package.
Still todo: add a deprecation warning in PALM
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: Leonid Kuligin <lkuligin@yandex.ru>
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
Fix some circular deps:
- move PromptValue into top level module bc both PromptTemplates and
OutputParsers import
- move tracer context vars to `tracers.context` and import them in
functions in `callbacks.manager`
- add core import tests
My thought is that the ==version would prevent pip from finding the
package on regular [pypi.org](http://pypi.org/), so it would look at
[test.pypi.org](http://test.pypi.org/) for that. Otherwise it'll pull
package from [pypi.org](http://pypi.org/) (e.g. sub deps)
Right now, the cli release is failing because it's going to
test.pypi.org by default, so it finds this incorrect FASTAPI package
instead of the real one: https://test.pypi.org/project/FASTAPI/
The new ruff version fixed the blocking bugs, and I was able to fairly
easily us to a passing state: ruff fixed some issues on its own, I fixed
a handful by hand, and I added a list of narrowly-targeted exclusions
for files that are currently failing ruff rules that we probably should
look into eventually.
I went pretty lenient on the docs / cookbooks rules, allowing dead code
and such things. Perhaps in the future we may want to tighten the rules
further, but this is already a good set of checks that found real issues
and will prevent them going forward.
PyPI trusted publishing wants to know which workflow is expected to do
the publish. We always want to publish from the same workflow, so we're
making `_test_release.yml` the only workflow that publishes to Test
PyPI.
This follows the principle of least privilege. Our `poetry build` step
doesn't need, and shouldn't get, access to our GitHub OIDC capability.
This is the same structure as I used in the already-merged PR for
refactoring the regular PyPI release workflow: #12578.
Best to review one commit at a time, since two of the commits are 100%
autogenerated changes from running `ruff format`:
- Install and use `ruff format` instead of black for code formatting.
- Output of `ruff format .` in the `langchain` package.
- Use `ruff format` in experimental package.
- Format changes in experimental package by `ruff format`.
- Manual formatting fixes to make `ruff .` pass.
Before making a new `langchain` release, we want to test that everything
works as expected. This PR lets us publish `langchain` to test PyPI,
then install it from there and run checks to ensure everything works
normally before publishing it "for real".
It also takes the opportunity to refactor the build process, splitting
up the build, release-creation, and PyPI upload steps into separate jobs
that do not share their elevated permissions with each other.
Adds a `langchain-location` param to lint, so we can properly locate it.
Regular langchain and experimental lint steps are passing, so default
value seems to be working.
