Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
GustavoSept
c2d09a5186
experimental[patch]: Makes regex customizable in text_splitter.py (SemanticChunker class) (#20485)
- **Description:** Currently, the regex is static (`r"(?<=[.?!])\s+"`),
which is only useful for certain use cases. The current change only
moves this to be a parameter of split_text(). Which adds flexibility
without making it more complex (as the default regex is still the same).
- **Issue:** Not applicable (I searched, no one seems to have created
this issue yet).
  - **Dependencies:** None.


_If no one reviews your PR within a few days, please @-mention one of
baskaryan, efriis, eyurtsev, hwchase17._

---------

Co-authored-by: Bagatur <22008038+baskaryan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
2024-04-25 00:32:40 +00:00
Leonid Ganeline
4159a4723c
experimental[patch]: update module doc strings (#19539)
Added missed module descriptions. Fixed format.
2024-03-26 10:38:10 -04:00
Zihong
ff31cc1648
experimental: update the notebook link of semantic chunk. (#19253)
update the notebook link of semantic chunk.
2024-03-19 07:24:51 -04:00
Cycle
77868b1974
experimental: add buffer_size hyperparameter to SemanticChunker as in source video (#19208)
add buffer_size hyperparameter which used in combine_sentences function
2024-03-19 03:54:20 +00:00
matt haigh
a4896da2a0
Experimental: Add other threshold types to SemanticChunker (#16807)
**Description**
Adding different threshold types to the semantic chunker. I’ve had much
better and predictable performance when using standard deviations
instead of percentiles.


![image](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/assets/44395485/066e84a8-460e-4da5-9fa1-4ff79a1941c5)

For all the documents I’ve tried, the distribution of distances look
similar to the above: positively skewed normal distribution. All skews
I’ve seen are less than 1 so that explains why standard deviations
perform well, but I’ve included IQR if anyone wants something more
robust.

Also, using the percentile method backwards, you can declare the number
of clusters and use semantic chunking to get an ‘optimal’ splitting.

---------

Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
2024-02-26 13:50:48 -08:00
Leonid Ganeline
3f6bf852ea
experimental: docstrings update (#18048)
Added missed docstrings. Formatted docsctrings to the consistent format.
2024-02-23 21:24:16 -05:00
Giulio Zani
9f0b63dba0
experimental[patch]: Fixes issue #17060 (#17062)
As described in issue #17060, in the case in which text has only one
sentence the following function fails. Checking for that and adding a
return case fixed the issue.

```python
    def split_text(self, text: str) -> List[str]:
        """Split text into multiple components."""
        # Splitting the essay on '.', '?', and '!'
        single_sentences_list = re.split(r"(?<=[.?!])\s+", text)
        sentences = [
            {"sentence": x, "index": i} for i, x in enumerate(single_sentences_list)
        ]
        sentences = combine_sentences(sentences)
        embeddings = self.embeddings.embed_documents(
            [x["combined_sentence"] for x in sentences]
        )
        for i, sentence in enumerate(sentences):
            sentence["combined_sentence_embedding"] = embeddings[i]
        distances, sentences = calculate_cosine_distances(sentences)
        start_index = 0

        # Create a list to hold the grouped sentences
        chunks = []
        breakpoint_percentile_threshold = 95
        breakpoint_distance_threshold = np.percentile(
            distances, breakpoint_percentile_threshold
        )  # If you want more chunks, lower the percentile cutoff

        indices_above_thresh = [
            i for i, x in enumerate(distances) if x > breakpoint_distance_threshold
        ]  # The indices of those breakpoints on your list

        # Iterate through the breakpoints to slice the sentences
        for index in indices_above_thresh:
            # The end index is the current breakpoint
            end_index = index

            # Slice the sentence_dicts from the current start index to the end index
            group = sentences[start_index : end_index + 1]
            combined_text = " ".join([d["sentence"] for d in group])
            chunks.append(combined_text)

            # Update the start index for the next group
            start_index = index + 1

        # The last group, if any sentences remain
        if start_index < len(sentences):
            combined_text = " ".join([d["sentence"] for d in sentences[start_index:]])
            chunks.append(combined_text)
        return chunks
```

Co-authored-by: Giulio Zani <salamanderxing@Giulios-MBP.homenet.telecomitalia.it>
2024-02-05 16:18:57 -08:00
Harrison Chase
20abe24819
experimental[minor]: Add semantic chunker (#15799) 2024-01-10 11:18:30 -05:00