The GPT Index project is transitioning to the new project name,
LlamaIndex.
I've updated a few files referencing the old project name and repository
URL to the current ones.
From the [LlamaIndex repo](https://github.com/jerryjliu/llama_index):
> NOTE: We are rebranding GPT Index as LlamaIndex! We will carry out
this transition gradually.
>
> 2/25/2023: By default, our docs/notebooks/instructions now reference
"LlamaIndex" instead of "GPT Index".
>
> 2/19/2023: By default, our docs/notebooks/instructions now use the
llama-index package. However the gpt-index package still exists as a
duplicate!
>
> 2/16/2023: We have a duplicate llama-index pip package. Simply replace
all imports of gpt_index with llama_index if you choose to pip install
llama-index.
I'm not associated with LlamaIndex in any way. I just noticed the
discrepancy when studying the lanchain documentation.
# What does this PR do?
This PR adds similar to `llms` a SageMaker-powered `embeddings` class.
This is helpful if you want to leverage Hugging Face models on SageMaker
for creating your indexes.
I added a example into the
[docs/modules/indexes/examples/embeddings.ipynb](https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/compare/master...philschmid:add-sm-embeddings?expand=1#diff-e82629e2894974ec87856aedd769d4bdfe400314b03734f32bee5990bc7e8062)
document. The example currently includes some `_### TEMPORARY: Showing
how to deploy a SageMaker Endpoint from a Hugging Face model ###_ ` code
showing how you can deploy a sentence-transformers to SageMaker and then
run the methods of the embeddings class.
@hwchase17 please let me know if/when i should remove the `_###
TEMPORARY: Showing how to deploy a SageMaker Endpoint from a Hugging
Face model ###_` in the description i linked to a detail blog on how to
deploy a Sentence Transformers so i think we don't need to include those
steps here.
I also reused the `ContentHandlerBase` from
`langchain.llms.sagemaker_endpoint` and changed the output type to `any`
since it is depending on the implementation.
Fixes the import typo in the vector db text generator notebook for the
chroma library
Co-authored-by: Anupam <anupam@10-16-252-145.dynapool.wireless.nyu.edu>
Use the following code to test:
```python
import os
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
from langchain.chains.api import podcast_docs
from langchain.chains import APIChain
# Get api key here: https://openai.com/pricing
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "sk-xxxxx"
# Get api key here: https://www.listennotes.com/api/pricing/
listen_api_key = 'xxx'
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0)
headers = {"X-ListenAPI-Key": listen_api_key}
chain = APIChain.from_llm_and_api_docs(llm, podcast_docs.PODCAST_DOCS, headers=headers, verbose=True)
chain.run("Search for 'silicon valley bank' podcast episodes, audio length is more than 30 minutes, return only 1 results")
```
Known issues: the api response data might be too big, and we'll get such
error:
`openai.error.InvalidRequestError: This model's maximum context length
is 4097 tokens, however you requested 6733 tokens (6477 in your prompt;
256 for the completion). Please reduce your prompt; or completion
length.`
New to Langchain, was a bit confused where I should find the toolkits
section when I'm at `agent/key_concepts` docs. I added a short link that
points to the how to section.
```
class Joke(BaseModel):
setup: str = Field(description="question to set up a joke")
punchline: str = Field(description="answer to resolve the joke")
joke_query = "Tell me a joke."
# Or, an example with compound type fields.
#class FloatArray(BaseModel):
# values: List[float] = Field(description="list of floats")
#
#float_array_query = "Write out a few terms of fiboacci."
model = OpenAI(model_name='text-davinci-003', temperature=0.0)
parser = PydanticOutputParser(pydantic_object=Joke)
prompt = PromptTemplate(
template="Answer the user query.\n{format_instructions}\n{query}\n",
input_variables=["query"],
partial_variables={"format_instructions": parser.get_format_instructions()}
)
_input = prompt.format_prompt(query=joke_query)
print("Prompt:\n", _input.to_string())
output = model(_input.to_string())
print("Completion:\n", output)
parsed_output = parser.parse(output)
print("Parsed completion:\n", parsed_output)
```
```
Prompt:
Answer the user query.
The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below. For example, the object {"foo": ["bar", "baz"]} conforms to the schema {"foo": {"description": "a list of strings field", "type": "string"}}.
Here is the output schema:
---
{"setup": {"description": "question to set up a joke", "type": "string"}, "punchline": {"description": "answer to resolve the joke", "type": "string"}}
---
Tell me a joke.
Completion:
{"setup": "Why don't scientists trust atoms?", "punchline": "Because they make up everything!"}
Parsed completion:
setup="Why don't scientists trust atoms?" punchline='Because they make up everything!'
```
Ofc, works only with LMs of sufficient capacity. DaVinci is reliable but
not always.
---------
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
PromptLayer now has support for [several different tracking
features.](https://magniv.notion.site/Track-4deee1b1f7a34c1680d085f82567dab9)
In order to use any of these features you need to have a request id
associated with the request.
In this PR we add a boolean argument called `return_pl_id` which will
add `pl_request_id` to the `generation_info` dictionary associated with
a generation.
We also updated the relevant documentation.
add the state_of_the_union.txt file so that its easier to follow through
with the example.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jithin James <jjmachan@pop-os.localdomain>
* Zapier Wrapper and Tools (implemented by Zapier Team)
* Zapier Toolkit, examples with mrkl agent
---------
Co-authored-by: Mike Knoop <mikeknoop@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Lewis <robert.lewis@zapier.com>
### Summary
Allows users to pass in `**unstructured_kwargs` to Unstructured document
loaders. Implemented with the `strategy` kwargs in mind, but will pass
in other kwargs like `include_page_breaks` as well. The two currently
supported strategies are `"hi_res"`, which is more accurate but takes
longer, and `"fast"`, which processes faster but with lower accuracy.
The `"hi_res"` strategy is the default. For PDFs, if `detectron2` is not
available and the user selects `"hi_res"`, the loader will fallback to
using the `"fast"` strategy.
### Testing
#### Make sure the `strategy` kwarg works
Run the following in iPython to verify that the `"fast"` strategy is
indeed faster.
```python
from langchain.document_loaders import UnstructuredFileLoader
loader = UnstructuredFileLoader("layout-parser-paper-fast.pdf", strategy="fast", mode="elements")
%timeit loader.load()
loader = UnstructuredFileLoader("layout-parser-paper-fast.pdf", mode="elements")
%timeit loader.load()
```
On my system I get:
```python
In [3]: from langchain.document_loaders import UnstructuredFileLoader
In [4]: loader = UnstructuredFileLoader("layout-parser-paper-fast.pdf", strategy="fast", mode="elements")
In [5]: %timeit loader.load()
247 ms ± 369 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
In [6]: loader = UnstructuredFileLoader("layout-parser-paper-fast.pdf", mode="elements")
In [7]: %timeit loader.load()
2.45 s ± 31 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
```
#### Make sure older versions of `unstructured` still work
Run `pip install unstructured==0.5.3` and then verify the following runs
without error:
```python
from langchain.document_loaders import UnstructuredFileLoader
loader = UnstructuredFileLoader("layout-parser-paper-fast.pdf", mode="elements")
loader.load()
```
# Description
Add `RediSearch` vectorstore for LangChain
RediSearch: [RediSearch quick
start](https://redis.io/docs/stack/search/quick_start/)
# How to use
```
from langchain.vectorstores.redisearch import RediSearch
rds = RediSearch.from_documents(docs, embeddings,redisearch_url="redis://localhost:6379")
```
Seeing a lot of issues in Discord in which the LLM is not using the
correct LIMIT clause for different SQL dialects. ie, it's using `LIMIT`
for mssql instead of `TOP`, or instead of `ROWNUM` for Oracle, etc.
I think this could be due to us specifying the LIMIT statement in the
example rows portion of `table_info`. So the LLM is seeing the `LIMIT`
statement used in the prompt.
Since we can't specify each dialect's method here, I think it's fine to
just replace the `SELECT... LIMIT 3;` statement with `3 rows from
table_name table:`, and wrap everything in a block comment directly
following the `CREATE` statement. The Rajkumar et al paper wrapped the
example rows and `SELECT` statement in a block comment as well anyway.
Thoughts @fpingham?
`OnlinePDFLoader` and `PagedPDFSplitter` lived separate from the rest of
the pdf loaders.
Because they're all similar, I propose moving all to `pdy.py` and the
same docs/examples page.
Additionally, `PagedPDFSplitter` naming doesn't match the pattern the
rest of the loaders follow, so I renamed to `PyPDFLoader` and had it
inherit from `BasePDFLoader` so it can now load from remote file
sources.
Provide shared memory capability for the Agent.
Inspired by #1293 .
## Problem
If both Agent and Tools (i.e., LLMChain) use the same memory, both of
them will save the context. It can be annoying in some cases.
## Solution
Create a memory wrapper that ignores the save and clear, thereby
preventing updates from Agent or Tools.
Simple CSV document loader which wraps `csv` reader, and preps the file
with a single `Document` per row.
The column header is prepended to each value for context which is useful
for context with embedding and semantic search
