- Update the RunCreate object to work with recent changes
- Add optional Example ID to the tracer
- Adjust default persist_session behavior to attempt to load the session
if it exists
- Raise more useful HTTP errors for logging
- Add unit testing
- Fix the default ID to be a UUID for v2 tracer sessions
Broken out from the big draft here:
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/pull/4061
* implemented arun, results, and aresults. Reuses aiosession if
available.
* helper tools GoogleSerperRun and GoogleSerperResults
* support for Google Images, Places and News (examples given) and
filtering based on time (e.g. past hour)
* updated docs
Haven't gotten to all of them, but this:
- Updates some of the tools notebooks to actually instantiate a tool
(many just show a 'utility' rather than a tool. More changes to come in
separate PR)
- Move the `Tool` and decorator definitions to `langchain/tools/base.py`
(but still export from `langchain.agents`)
- Add scene explain to the load_tools() function
- Add unit tests for public apis for the langchain.tools and langchain.agents modules
Move tool validation to each implementation of the Agent.
Another alternative would be to adjust the `_validate_tools()` signature
to accept the output parser (and format instructions) and add logic
there. Something like
`parser.outputs_structured_actions(format_instructions)`
But don't think that's needed right now.
- Add langchain.llms.GooglePalm for text completion,
- Add langchain.chat_models.ChatGooglePalm for chat completion,
- Add langchain.embeddings.GooglePalmEmbeddings for sentence embeddings,
- Add example field to HumanMessage and AIMessage so that users can feed
in examples into the PaLM Chat API,
- Add system and unit tests.
Note async completion for the Text API is not yet supported and will be
included in a future PR.
Happy for feedback on any aspect of this PR, especially our choice of
adding an example field to Human and AI Message objects to enable
passing example messages to the API.
This pull request adds unit tests for various output parsers
(BooleanOutputParser, CommaSeparatedListOutputParser, and
StructuredOutputParser) to ensure their correct functionality and to
increase code reliability and maintainability. The tests cover both
valid and invalid input cases.
Changes:
Added unit tests for BooleanOutputParser.
Added unit tests for CommaSeparatedListOutputParser.
Added unit tests for StructuredOutputParser.
Testing:
All new unit tests have been executed, and they pass successfully.
The overall test suite has been run, and all tests pass.
Notes:
These tests cover both successful parsing scenarios and error handling
for invalid inputs.
If any new output parsers are added in the future, corresponding unit
tests should also be created to maintain coverage.
Enum to string conversion handled differently between python 3.9 and
3.11, currently breaking in 3.11 (see #3788). Thanks @peter-brady for
catching this!
In the current solution, AgentType and AGENT_TO_CLASS are placed in two
separate files and both manually maintained. This might cause
inconsistency when we update either of them.
— latest —
based on the discussion with hwchase17, we don’t know how to further use
the newly introduced AgentTypeConfig type, so it doesn’t make sense yet
to add it. Instead, it’s better to move the dictionary to another file
to keep the loading.py file clear. The consistency is a good point.
Instead of asserting the consistency during linting, we added a unittest
for consistency check. I think it works as auto unittest is triggered
every time with clear failure notice. (well, force push is possible, but
we all know what we are doing, so let’s show trust. :>)
~~This PR includes~~
- ~~Introduced AgentTypeConfig as the source of truth of all AgentType
related meta data.~~
- ~~Each AgentTypeConfig is a annotated class type which can be used for
annotation in other places.~~
- ~~Each AgentTypeConfig can be easily extended when we have more meta
data needs.~~
- ~~Strong assertion to ensure AgentType and AGENT_TO_CLASS are always
consistent.~~
- ~~Made AGENT_TO_CLASS automatically generated.~~
~~Test Plan:~~
- ~~since this change is focusing on annotation, lint is the major test
focus.~~
- ~~lint, format and test passed on local.~~
This **partially** addresses
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/1524, but it's also useful
for some of our use cases.
This `DocstoreFn` allows to lookup a document given a function that
accepts the `search` string without the need to implement a custom
`Docstore`.
This could be useful when:
* you don't want to implement a `Docstore` just to provide a custom
`search`
* it's expensive to construct an `InMemoryDocstore`/dict
* you retrieve documents from remote sources
* you just want to reuse existing objects
Add other File Utilities, include
- List Directory
- Search for file
- Move
- Copy
- Remove file
Bundle as toolkit
Add a notebook that connects to the Chat Agent, which somewhat supports
multi-arg input tools
Update original read/write files to return the original dir paths and
better handle unsupported file paths.
Add unit tests
I think the logic of
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/pull/3684#pullrequestreview-1405358565
is too confusing.
I prefer this alternative because:
- All `Tool()` implementations by default will be treated the same as
before. No breaking changes.
- Less reliance on pydantic magic
- The decorator (which only is typed as returning a callable) can infer
schema and generate a structured tool
- Either way, the recommended way to create a custom tool is through
inheriting from the base tool
Tradeoffs here:
- No lint-time checking for compatibility
- Differs from JS package
- The signature inference, etc. in the base tool isn't simple
- The `args_schema` is optional
Pros:
- Forwards compatibility retained
- Doesn't break backwards compatibility
- User doesn't have to think about which class to subclass (single base
tool or dynamic `Tool` interface regardless of input)
- No need to change the load_tools, etc. interfaces
Co-authored-by: Hasan Patel <mangafield@gmail.com>
This catches the warning raised when using duckdb, asserts that it's as expected.
The goal is to resolve all existing warnings to make unit-testing much stricter.
This PR introduces a Blob data type and a Blob loader interface.
This is the first of a sequence of PRs that follows this proposal:
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/pull/2833
The primary goals of these abstraction are:
* Decouple content loading from content parsing code.
* Help duplicated content loading code from document loaders.
* Make lazy loading a default for langchain.
This commit adds a new unit test for the _merge_splits function in the
text splitter. The new test verifies that the function merges text into
chunks of the correct size and overlap, using a specified separator. The
test passes on the current implementation of the function.
Fix for: [Changed regex to cover new line before action
serious.](https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/3365)
---
This PR fixes the issue where `ValueError: Could not parse LLM output:`
was thrown on seems to be valid input.
Changed regex to cover new lines before action serious (after the
keywords "Action:" and "Action Input:").
regex101: https://regex101.com/r/CXl1kB/1
---------
Co-authored-by: msarskus <msarskus@cisco.com>
- Proactively raise error if a tool subclasses BaseTool, defines its
own schema, but fails to add the type-hints
- fix the auto-inferred schema of the decorator to strip the
unneeded virtual kwargs from the schema dict
Helps avoid silent instances of #3297
- Permit the specification of a `root_dir` to the read/write file tools
to specify a working directory
- Add validation for attempts to read/write outside the directory (e.g.,
through `../../` or symlinks or `/abs/path`'s that don't lie in the
correct path)
- Add some tests for all
One question is whether we should make a default root directory for
these? tradeoffs either way
`langchain.prompts.PromptTemplate` and
`langchain.prompts.FewShotPromptTemplate` do not validate
`input_variables` when initialized as `jinja2` template.
```python
# Using langchain v0.0.144
template = """"\
Your variable: {{ foo }}
{% if bar %}
You just set bar boolean variable to true
{% endif %}
"""
# Missing variable, should raise ValueError
prompt_template = PromptTemplate(template=template,
input_variables=["bar"],
template_format="jinja2",
validate_template=True)
# Extra variable, should raise ValueError
prompt_template = PromptTemplate(template=template,
input_variables=["bar", "foo", "extra", "thing"],
template_format="jinja2",
validate_template=True)
```
- Remove dynamic model creation in the `args()` property. _Only infer
for the decorator (and add an argument to NOT infer if someone wishes to
only pass as a string)_
- Update the validation example to make it less likely to be
misinterpreted as a "safe" way to run a repl
There is one example of "Multi-argument tools" in the custom_tools.ipynb
from yesterday, but we could add more. The output parsing for the base
MRKL agent hasn't been adapted to handle structured args at this point
in time
---------
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
`langchain.prompts.PromptTemplate` is unable to infer `input_variables`
from jinja2 template.
```python
# Using langchain v0.0.141
template_string = """\
Hello world
Your variable: {{ var }}
{# This will not get rendered #}
{% if verbose %}
Congrats! You just turned on verbose mode and got extra messages!
{% endif %}
"""
template = PromptTemplate.from_template(template_string, template_format="jinja2")
print(template.input_variables) # Output ['# This will not get rendered #', '% endif %', '% if verbose %']
```
---------
Co-authored-by: engkheng <ongengkheng929@example.com>
