* For #15278: added CoroutineManager to count runBlocking calls
* For #15278: Added actual detekt rule for runblocking and its config to the yaml
* For #15278: Added unit test for RunblockingCounter
* For #15278: renamed StrictModeStartupSuppressionCountTest.kt to PerformanceStartupTest.kt and added runBlockingCount test
* Lint fix
* For #15278: made runblocking a Long to prevent overflow
* For #15278: fixed MozRunblocking name, description and moved RunBlockingCounter to perf package
* For #15278:Renamed MozillaRunblockingCheck to MozillaRunBlockingCheck
* For #15278: Added setup for unit test, since it failed without restting counter
* For #15278: Fixed naming for RunBlocking lint check
* For #15278: removed changes made to test to use runBlockingIncrement
* For #15728: added test exclusion for runBlocking check
* For #15278: changed null check and added Synchronized to count setter
* For #15278: fix for nits
* For #15278: added StartupExcessiveResourceUseTest to CODEOWNERS
* For #15278: fixed for nits
* For #15278: Moved increment function to extension function and fixed indentation
* For #15278: Added tests for Atomic Integer extension and nit fix
* For #15929: Remove SearchWidgetCFR telemetry.
* For #15929: Remove SearchWidgetCFR and search widget experiment.
* For #15929: Remove unit tests references to search widget experiment.
While the callback receiver is identical in these two methods, they're
semantically different: apply is for initializing the receiver while with
is anything else benefiting from a new `this` receiver.
I didn't change the usage of apply that has a return statement because I
was afraid my change might change behavior.
The new robolectric version changed the behavior such that the app ID
that was returned for our app was `org.mozilla.fenix.debug` instead of
(I guess) `org.mozilla.fenix`. In general, relying on robolectric can be
fragile, such as this case, so it's better to mock. Also, this test
behavior should theoretically have varied between build flavors so
mocking prevents the tests from breaking across flavors.
In a followup PR, we need to add state to strictModeManager (the
number of suppressions). This is much simpler to do when this is defined
as a class rather than an object. However, when this is defined as a
class, `resetAfter` needs access to the strictModeManager. Instead of
passing it in as an argument, it made sense to move this function onto
the strictModeManager instead.
Since folks are used to calling:
```
StrictMode.ThreadPolicy.allowThreadDiskReads().resetAfter
```
We're going to have to add a lint check to prevent them from doing that.
* Add PWA events to metrics.
Track events for add to homescreen and install.
Map PWA facts to events
* Map component facts to local metrics
Add events pings to fragments
Supress long method for events
Move install event to AC and collect facts
Retrieve fg and bg events from Facts. Do not track intent fg/bg events, only views
* Allow onPause in base fragment to send telemetry for PWA in the external app fragment. Track foreground and bg locally in fenix, and route install and home screen taps from AC facts
* Rebase
Our kotlin code is not catching the `MissingResourceException` in the `LeanplumMetricsService` which results in the app crashing when the locale isn't known by the device.
Catches the exception, and falls back to the ISO 639 language code. This isn't a great solution, because ISO 639 isn't especially stable.
In practice however this is almost certainly never going to be a problem because Leanplum isn't going to be supported in such exotic locales.
In this case, using the ISO 639 language code allows the error message to be more informative.
lint check
renamed the intentReceived telemetry to appOpenedAllSource
added comments
removed unused code
moved lifecycle process to AppAllSourceStartTelemetry
moved tracking event out of init function
lint fix
moved appAllStartTelemetry to components
added bit more info about the metrics
added the onReceivedIntent metric back
minor fix
change discriptions based on the comments frm MR
wrote test cases for AppAllSourceStartTelemetry.kt
lint fix
test case to mock application going background
post rebase:
post rebase:
fixed nit from comments
fixed nit from comments
fixed nit from comments
lint fix
lint fix
* Extract controller into it's own class. Implement find dupes and filter based on username.
Create edit login controller. Add text watchers and check for duplicates.
Edit controller test
* Find duplicates and save to store
* Retrieve duplicates from AC and check list on username text changed
Move duplicates logic into the controller
* Add glean pings for delete and edit. Move logic for login manipulation into the datastore.
* Use correct threads in controller. Enable save button when applicable.
Save enabled in datastore.
Move login data to datastore
Rebase with password error states
Update metrics to be more specific for edit
* Create logins controller for AC calls
* Interactor and controller methods for edit login. Add edit view to separate out some layout manipulation.
Inflate view in edit fragment. Double layout showing up.
Edit view
Controller tests
Controller tests passing
Interactor tests
Lint and detekt cleanup
* Remove datastore and use storage controller for all logins calls to password storage.
Addressed comments
Lint
:
Rebase - 1
* For 11657: add LP attribute for tracking protection
* For #11704: added tracking_protection_enabled attribute
* Added docs for the new attributes, linking to data-review to the mma.md
* Rename null to none when no ETP is enabled
* for #11830 added new metric for collecting startup method
move all source startup telemetry into its own logic and added an UNKOWN state
* switched back to onNewIntent solution
* renamed the metric