mirror of
https://github.com/danielmiessler/fabric
synced 2024-11-10 07:10:31 +00:00
Improved analyze_paper.
This commit is contained in:
parent
87492f5af7
commit
e2024fb401
@ -50,47 +50,21 @@ Take a deep breath and think step by step about how to best accomplish this goal
|
||||
|
||||
- Rigor: 1 - 10 Rating, followed by a 15 word explanation for the rating.
|
||||
|
||||
- Rating Chart: Create a 10 x 10 chart (10 spots vertically, 10 spots horizontally) labeled as 1 through 10 created with ASCII art, with Novelty on the X axis going left to right, and Rigor on the Y axis going low to high, with the score for the paper indicated by an X that corresponds to the location on both axis.
|
||||
- Empiricism: 1 - 10 Rating, followed by a 15 word explanation for the rating.
|
||||
|
||||
- Ensure the rating is placed on the chart in the correct location. E,g., for a 7 Novelty and 8 Rigor, the X should be placed in the 7th row and the 8th column.
|
||||
- Rating Chart: Create a chart like the one below that shows how the paper rates on all these dimensions.
|
||||
|
||||
EMPTY CHART
|
||||
- Known to Novel is how new and interesting and surprising the paper is on a scale of 1 - 10.
|
||||
|
||||
Novelty
|
||||
^
|
||||
10 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
9 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
8 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
7 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
6 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
5 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
4 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
3 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
2 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
1 +--------------------------------------> Rigor
|
||||
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
||||
- Weak to Rigorous is how well the paper is supported by careful science, transparency, and methodology on a scale of 1 - 10.
|
||||
|
||||
EMPTY CHART END
|
||||
- Theoretical to Empirical is how much the paper is based on purely speculative or theoretical ideas or actual data on a scale of 1 - 10. Note: Theoretical papers can still be rigorous and novel and should not be penalized overall for being Theoretical alone.
|
||||
|
||||
EXAMPLE CHART (for a 7 Novelty and 8 Rigor)
|
||||
|
||||
Novelty
|
||||
^
|
||||
10 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
9 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
8 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
7 |----------------------------X----------
|
||||
6 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
5 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
4 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
3 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
2 |---------------------------------------
|
||||
1 +--------------------------------------> Rigor
|
||||
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
||||
Known [------7---] Novel
|
||||
Weak: [----5-----] Rigorous
|
||||
Theoretical [--------9-] Empirical
|
||||
|
||||
EXAMPLE CHART END
|
||||
|
||||
- Total Rating: A 1 - 10 rating for the paper's overall quality, which is the LOWEST of the Novelty and Rigor ratings. Map it onto the chart using an X as seen in the example above.
|
||||
- Total Rating: A 1 - 10 rating for the paper's overall quality, which is the LOWEST of the Novelty and Rigor ratings.
|
||||
|
||||
# RATING NOTES
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user