mirror of
https://github.com/danielmiessler/fabric
synced 2024-11-08 07:11:06 +00:00
Upgrades to analyze_prose.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1415aad69e
commit
9998f4296c
@ -10,6 +10,14 @@ Take a step back and think step-by-step about how to achieve the best outcomes b
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Fully digest and understand the content and the likely intent of the writer, i.e., what they wanted to convey to the reader, viewer, listener.
|
1. Fully digest and understand the content and the likely intent of the writer, i.e., what they wanted to convey to the reader, viewer, listener.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. Evaluate the SURPRISE of the ideas in the writing in a Claude Shannon information theory sense, i.e., how surprising or novel were the ideas?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
"A - Brilliant" -- Surprising, fresh, and new ideas or approaches on the topic.
|
||||||
|
"B - Strong" -- Innovative, but not all that surprising or fresh.
|
||||||
|
"C - Decent" -- Improvement and clarification of well-known ideas.
|
||||||
|
"D - Shallow" -- Largely derivative or well-known ideas.
|
||||||
|
"F - Vapid" -- Claiming credit for existing ideas, and/or lack of any ideas.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. Evaluate the CLARITY of the writing on the following scale.
|
2. Evaluate the CLARITY of the writing on the following scale.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
"A - Crystal Clear" -- The writing is very clear about the ideas being expressed.
|
"A - Crystal Clear" -- The writing is very clear about the ideas being expressed.
|
||||||
@ -18,14 +26,6 @@ Take a step back and think step-by-step about how to achieve the best outcomes b
|
|||||||
"D - Confusing" -- The writing is very confusing, and it's not clear what's being said.
|
"D - Confusing" -- The writing is very confusing, and it's not clear what's being said.
|
||||||
"F - Chaotic" -- It's not even clear what's being attempted.
|
"F - Chaotic" -- It's not even clear what's being attempted.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. Evaluate the SURPRISE of the ideas in the writing on the following scale, in a Claude Shannon information theory sense. I.e., how surprising or novel were the ideas?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
"A - Brilliant" -- Surprising, fresh, and significantly new ideas or approaches on the topic.
|
|
||||||
"B - Strong" -- Innovative, but not all that surprising or fresh.
|
|
||||||
"C - Decent" -- Improvement and clarification of well-known ideas.
|
|
||||||
"D - Shallow" -- Largely derivative or well-known ideas.
|
|
||||||
"F - Vapid" -- Claiming credit for existing ideas, and/or lack of any ideas.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. Evaluate the PROSE in the writing on the following scale.
|
4. Evaluate the PROSE in the writing on the following scale.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
"A - Inspired" -- Clear, fresh, lively prose.
|
"A - Inspired" -- Clear, fresh, lively prose.
|
||||||
@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ Take a step back and think step-by-step about how to achieve the best outcomes b
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
```json
|
```json
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"surprise-rating": "B - (tagline)",
|
"surprise-rating": "B - (rating tagline)",
|
||||||
"surprise-rating-explanation": "A 15-20 word sentence justifying your rating.",
|
"surprise-rating-explanation": "A 15-20 word sentence justifying your rating.",
|
||||||
"clarity-rating": "A - (tagline)",
|
"clarity-rating": "A - (rating tagline)",
|
||||||
"clarity-rating-explanation": "A 15-20 word sentence justifying your rating.",
|
"clarity-rating-explanation": "A 15-20 word sentence justifying your rating.",
|
||||||
"prose-rating": "C - (tagline)",
|
"prose-rating": "C - (rating tagline)",
|
||||||
"prose-rating-explanation": "A 15-20 word sentence justifying your rating.",
|
"prose-rating-explanation": "A 15-20 word sentence justifying your rating.",
|
||||||
"recommendations": "The list of recommendations.",
|
"recommendations": "The list of recommendations.",
|
||||||
"one-sentence-summary": "A 20-word, one-sentence summary of the overall quality of the prose based on the ratings and explanations in the other fields."
|
"one-sentence-summary": "A 20-word, one-sentence summary of the overall quality of the prose based on the ratings and explanations in the other fields."
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user