Fix cda6f24f: don't ignore binary-dir if it happens to be working-dir (#11431)

Some of our code ignores the SP_WORKING_DIR for some actions, which
means that if, for example, your SP_BINARY_DIR is the same as your
SP_WORKING_DIR, neither is scanned.

Instead, only add SP_WORKING_DIR if it is unique.

(cherry picked from commit c059ce0c97)
pull/615/head
Patric Stout 7 months ago committed by Jonathan G Rennison
parent 63ed5de957
commit 0b226865d5

@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ static void FillValidSearchPaths(bool only_local_path)
btree::btree_set<std::string_view> seen{};
for (Searchpath sp = SP_FIRST_DIR; sp < NUM_SEARCHPATHS; sp++) {
if (sp == SP_WORKING_DIR) continue;
if (only_local_path) {
switch (sp) {
case SP_WORKING_DIR: // Can be influence by "-c" option.
@ -106,6 +108,13 @@ static void FillValidSearchPaths(bool only_local_path)
_valid_searchpaths.emplace_back(sp);
}
}
/* The working-directory is special, as it is controlled by _do_scan_working_directory.
* Only add the search path if it isn't already in the set. To preserve the same order
* as the enum, insert it in the front. */
if (IsValidSearchPath(SP_WORKING_DIR) && seen.count(_searchpaths[SP_WORKING_DIR]) == 0) {
_valid_searchpaths.insert(_valid_searchpaths.begin(), SP_WORKING_DIR);
}
}
/**

Loading…
Cancel
Save